Nintendo Revolution Vs. Xbox360

ilovefishsticks

ilovefishsticks

New Member
Shur u guys are all talking about Xbox 360 and PS3, but wout about Nintendo Revolution. It looks like a kick ass system, but so does Xbox360 here I'd say PS3 will suck but thats only cuz im not a play station fan (I think they all suck exept 4 psp is alright but DS is better). What do u goys think about it???
 
Yeah your right.... nintendo revolution does LOOK like a great system.
Thats all. 'Looks'.

Personally i think ps3 will own all, since it has the highest specs, and because of the brand....

If i had to choose it would be the ps3.
 
How could you say DS is better than PSP? Maybe better for a 8yr old....
When you play with a ds it feels you are going back in time. PSPs are much better, not because it totally owns the ds in the specs department, but because the games kick ass!
 
Most of Nintendos games suck. I think X-box will own them all. Either way specs arent the entire picture, I think it is the games that make or break a console.
 
691175002 said:
Most of Nintendos games suck. I think X-box will own them all. Either way specs arent the entire picture, I think it is the games that make or break a console.
Click to expand...


roger that!
 
Of course games make a system. That why i cant see how, so many people can come in these boards and blast the revolution. If the developers are able to truly use this new interface, the games are going to be incredible. And not to mention Nintendo's first party games are always top-notch.

Let's all just sit back relax, and enjoy the experiences that each console will bring to the table.
 
Well my advice is the ps3. I had an xbox about 2 years old. I sold it for 150 or something like that. I'm getting the ps3 and psp. They rules better than the xbox and xbox360 version. I really hate them.
 
Not anouther of these threads they should be banned lol because 95% of posts are from fan boys. Dont compare till they are actualy released. And half the points on here about PS3 the question is comparing Xbox360 with Revelution.

Nintendo pride them selfs on new concepts thats what makes them different, For example touch screen on the DS and the controlers on the Revelution.
 
Its amazing how many of us say that same message, yet you're never gonna get rid of this threads, because people refuse to be open-minded.
 
Syphr said:
Its amazing how many of us say that same message, yet you're never gonna get rid of this threads, because people refuse to be open-minded.
Click to expand...

Haha saying that I was also going to say the other 5% is split up into people saying what I said and giving facts on proposed specifications lol.
 
I try to stay away from being a fanboy, although I think the XBOX is better than the PS2. We really have to wait and see the PS3 and judge from there. It really should be personal taste if you ask me.
 
Last edited:
Nintendo has always been cuatious about their systems and products. thats why they never really lose money on any of their systems. maybe the micro? its pretty worthless to me in opinion.

Anyway, comaparing the Revolution with the PS3 and the Xbox360 is something totally different. Nintendo isn't even trying to compete with the PS3 or Xbox360 because their motive is to have a low budget, great low cost system.

So...there really is no point to compare the Revo. w/ the 360 because that isn't the case. Nintendo is more of... lets say trying to change the gameplay of gaming consoles, like for example its controller. it does wonders.

360 n ps3 on the other hand is offereing powerful engines and great amazing graphics. totally different.
 
I love how people get pissed off when one of these threads is started. Sure there is a lot of fanboyism and pointless arguments, but it sure is entertaining! Of course when you see a thread topic titled "revolution vs. xbox 360" theres gonna be something we call "opinions". Of course people like different things, not everyone likes ham sandwhiches for example. If you started a thread that was titled "ham sandwhiches vs. BLT sandwhiches", you'd get the same thing.

Personally (there we go, personal "opinion"), I really dont care about the next gen consoles. Xbox 360 and PS3 are gonna be so freaking expensive that it defeats the purpose of being a toy (which is what I classify consoles as). The revolution is the only console I am slightly interested in. It will be cheap, innovative, and most likely entertaining. Now even though I am an eye candy whore, I still wouldnt consider purchasing the X360 or the PS3, until the price comes WAY down. I'd rather spend that kind of money on something that would be much more useful to me. The revolution on the other hand is supposed to be an extremely reasonable price, which fits the "toy" part much better. So to answer the question of the title, revolution wins for me(Theres that "opinion" thing again).


(Note: If this post seemed to make no sense or had no sense of direction, then it probably didn't. I'm hopped up on Perscription cold medicines right now.)
 
Nintendo went overboard with there new crazy ass piece of shit wire controller thing. They're trying desperately to make a console thats total bollocks look cool and failing badly.
 
screw that, Nintendo does a great job at what they do, okay? Nintendo is primarily used by kids, how would you like it if you had like 3 kids, and all of them wanted a game consol, didnt matter which one, and there was the Xbox360 at like $500, the PS3 at like $600, and then the Rev at like $150, which would buy? personally nintendo are the people who care about people, they are out to make money, but not rob people from it.... they care
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top