Official 3DMark06 Rank Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dang that sucks. What brand gts250 is it? My gts250 is only 65nm :( I get about the same shader clock with 825 core (linked), a little over 2k. I tried unlinking but they both seem to be maxxed out where they are at.
EVGA, if your folding drop your core down to about 750/760, fanspeed 100%, and then take the shader up.

Most GTS250 are 55nm....unlucky you got a 65nm:mad:

My 9800gtx from XFX is a whole lot nicer looking, all under a nice plastic shrowd while the evga has exposed fan wires and etc. Still, cant complain because like i said, cost me $24:D

For general use and folding....the GTS250 is a killer card, fillrate on them is still higher than the gtx260 or core216 while the GTX260 has better memory bandwidth.
 
Last edited:
Ok heres my Benchmark with all default settings :) I'm planning on overclocking my GPU as soon as i get water cooling sorted and then take my CPU further so i should get a higher benchmark soon!

13yqjgg.jpg


I have the phenom 550 which is basically a 955 with two cores shut off. I have scored 15,500 with my X2 550 so why is a 955 only scoring a 17,000. I just though it would score higher with 2 more cores but maybe not?
 
EVGA, if your folding drop your core down to about 750/760, fanspeed 100%, and then take the shader up.

Nope not folding, just gaming.

Most GTS250 are 55nm....unlucky you got a 65nm:mad:

Tell me about it :mad:

My 9800gtx from XFX is a whole lot nicer looking, all under a nice plastic shrowd while the evga has exposed fan wires and etc. Still, cant complain because like i said, cost me $24:D

For general use and folding....the GTS250 is a killer card, fillrate on them is still higher than the gtx260 or core216 while the GTX260 has better memory bandwidth.

$24? You suck....haha. Yeah the gts250 is a great card, I've been looking around for a gtx275 though. Since I went to full 1080 sometimes the framerates drop a little too much.
 
Ok heres my Benchmark with all default settings :) I'm planning on overclocking my GPU as soon as i get water cooling sorted and then take my CPU further so i should get a higher benchmark soon!

13yqjgg.jpg

wow nice...

i didnt expect a AMD Phenom II 955 BE X4 @ 3.4GHz to get more 3d marks than a Q6600 at the same clock speed.

im sure mine just barely gets to 16,000 im not sure,Il re-run 3d mark later.
 
Finally got 3DMark06 installed. I defragged and ran the test twice I was :eek: when it got the the CPU tests. lol i got 0-2 FPS. anyway enough babbling here's my score:

3DMark06.jpg


cpuz.jpg


gpuz.jpg


11k isn't too bad i guess. If my 4850 never got lost in the post system i think i'd have a higher score. I might just get myself an E8500 (might be getting a cheapy off a friend)

Omega please update the thread i'd like to be on it :P plus we have a new high score.
 
Last edited:
LoL I asked a question, then figured it out by googling a few seconds later, edited the post before 1 minute later so it now looks like I just posted Edit. :P
 
Right managed to get my Q6600 to 3.3Ghz again after some problems ive had recently...not tried 3.4 again yet.



I dunno,i dont think the results are all that impressive compared to FairDoos score a few pages back :cool:

ocpoor.png
 
Last edited:
How come CPU-Z shows 3.3ghz, but 3dmark shows 3.7ghz in 2 different places? Which one was the test run at?

Im not sure why it does that actualy,even in my system properties in windows it says 3.72Ghz.

Im at 3.3Ghz though...pff i wish i could get 3.7Ghz :D
 
Right managed to get my Q6600 to 3.3Ghz again after some problems ive had recently...not tried 3.4 again yet.



I dunno,i dont think the results are all that impressive compared to FairDoos score a few pages back :cool:


the 17k run with a phenom? or the 28k run by me? :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top