Thats just at 5GHz mate. I could probably get higher, but need better cooling![]()
Thats just at 5GHz mate. I could probably get higher, but need better cooling![]()
Maybe if this is going to come down to a numbers war, then I can get a 3930k and a 2011 board and see what it would do at 4.5 or so. Should break 10k with that.![]()
Maybe if this is going to come down to a numbers war, then I can get a 3930k and a 2011 board and see what it would do at 4.5 or so. Should break 10k with that.![]()
Maybe if this is going to come down to a numbers war, then I can get a 3930k and a 2011 board and see what it would do at 4.5 or so. Should break 10k with that.![]()
I would postulate that a 2600K is about 15% slower than a 3930K at stock. The 2600K has a better OC headroom though, so I would doubt if you see a 5% increase. That means it may get 9,050 - 9,100 is my guess.
yeah, But I think over 5ghz will not gain much points.
I would play safe with your cooler, because the benchmark is running 4-5min.
what temps did you got when running?![]()
Well, on this particular program it is tieing the 2600k @ 4.7 with it at stock. So pushing it up would get it above the 2600k top end fairly quickly. even 4.0 or 4.2 or the like would still score very well.I would postulate that a 2600K is about 15% slower than a 3930K at stock.
Yeah im going to install a 2 x 120mm rad and dedicate it to the CPU, then i reckon 5.5 on my mobo is possible