Official Screenshot Thread
- Thread starter skidude
- Start date
INTELCRAZY
banned
I owned this dude the same way about 3 times. Until a heli flew over, and put on an early fourth of July show in my face. I am a pretty decent sniper, vehicles get in my way though.
Dual_Corex2
banned
You really dont wanna piss this guy off....
WeatherGeek
New Member
Fsx
Some flight simulator X screenshots...
Some flight simulator X screenshots...
Maddhatter
New Member
wow 15 FPS for me is unplayable
Dual_Corex2
banned
I have it set on Ultra settings, no AA, 16x AF, at 1024x768 smooth framerates...
When i take screens, sometimes there is 2xAA applied to make it look pretty, but it takes a good stab in my fps since i only have a 64-bit memory on this little card. It still pumps out well though.
Ill take another and tell me. Cuz i personally think the graphics look bad as well.
To the flight sim guy, if your using an 8800GTS and your getting 15fps in those screens......you have a serious problem that id find right away..
Dual_Corex2
banned
Hows this? I just increased the resolution, thats it.
I think it looks pretty good.....but iv def seen better.
I think it looks pretty good.....but iv def seen better.
kobaj
VIP Member
Arnt you required to have 512 mb on your graphics card to be able to set it to ultra high? I agree, It could be better. Anywho, I think it is your card, I'm going to take a stab at...you have a GO (laptop) 6600, or dare I say it, a 5500? What kind of frames are you getting also?
Dual_Corex2
banned
No, i dont have a laptop. Its a 7300GS 256mb 64-bit DDR (512mb with TC).
In those screens at 1280x1024, my average fps was about 15 lol. But when i ran it at 1024x768 at same settings, i would average 37-56 fps. Really isnt that bad at all i dont think for a 64-bit memory.
Im still waiting for my 8800GTS though.....and i just scored 585 in 3dmark 06 with 1gb dual channel DDR @ 5gb/s as opposed to my earlier score of 409 with 1.7gb single channel DDR @ 2.4gb/s. So iv learned that more RAM isnt always better for gaming. At least not as important as speed.
Everything was set to the highest quality i could.
I looked at your screens, i think yours only looked better cuz of the amount of AA you were using on them. My card only does 4x AA and i dont use AA cuz i prefer just increasing the res, and at 1024x768 its already sorta hard on my card applying AA kills my fps.
In those screens at 1280x1024, my average fps was about 15 lol. But when i ran it at 1024x768 at same settings, i would average 37-56 fps. Really isnt that bad at all i dont think for a 64-bit memory.
Im still waiting for my 8800GTS though.....and i just scored 585 in 3dmark 06 with 1gb dual channel DDR @ 5gb/s as opposed to my earlier score of 409 with 1.7gb single channel DDR @ 2.4gb/s. So iv learned that more RAM isnt always better for gaming. At least not as important as speed.
Everything was set to the highest quality i could.
I looked at your screens, i think yours only looked better cuz of the amount of AA you were using on them. My card only does 4x AA and i dont use AA cuz i prefer just increasing the res, and at 1024x768 its already sorta hard on my card applying AA kills my fps.
Last edited:
kobaj
VIP Member
Ahh, I'm an idiot, I read it as 64mb, not 64-bit for what type of graphics card you have. My bad. 
Anywho, the 7300gs is a lower end card, some 6800s can beat it with frames/3dmark score...in my humble opinion.
Meh, I wouldnt worry to much about it. Those are just screenshots, in game when your running away from the demons you dont really notice a couple low graphics
.
Anywho, the 7300gs is a lower end card, some 6800s can beat it with frames/3dmark score...in my humble opinion.
Meh, I wouldnt worry to much about it. Those are just screenshots, in game when your running away from the demons you dont really notice a couple low graphics
.
Dual_Corex2
banned
Ahh, I'm an idiot, I read it as 64mb, not 64-bit for what type of graphics card you have. My bad.
Anywho, the 7300gs is a lower end card, some 6800s can beat it with frames/3dmark score...in my humble opinion.
Meh, I wouldnt worry to much about it. Those are just screenshots, in game when your running away from the demons you dont really notice a couple low graphics
lol yea. But like i said, it runs fine without AA @ 1024x768. Smooth. Ill post a screen with fps.
And also, i think 6800s pwn the 7300. I wish i could still game with my ol 6800, it was alot better then this. But my old computer is still under maintance, im ordering a new PSU for it, the PSU i originally bought for it is being used for my currenty computer to power my new 8800GTS when it arrives lol.
Im just buying a PSU/Case combo for $100, not a real fancy case but decent PSU. I miss my 6800 like hell : (
WeatherGeek
New Member
Do you play FSX? Same to the person who said 15FPS is unplayable. My settings are very high, autogen maxxed just to check it out. FSX is much more CPU dependant than GPU, and my FPS are fine/common for a system with my specs.
ADE
banned
Hows this? I just increased the resolution, thats it.
I think it looks pretty good.....but iv def seen better.
Is Doom 3 any good of a game? I mean, should I buy it?
Dual_Corex2
banned
Those "FSX" graphics look just the same as my FS2004 graphics, and even my 5200 did pretty good with it. My 6800 did it maxed just fine @ 1280x960.
Last edited:
Dual_Corex2
banned
Indeed. Doom3 is an awsome game. Iv just started playing it again, i think im almost at the end. But man its tough. Even on easy im having a hard time. I couldnt imagine it being any harder, but then it might be a different story when my 8800 arrives so that i can game at super fast speeds and awsome detailed graphics, maybe ill get better