As I learn about PC technologies studying online - I've been reading a few articles on Overclocking.
Looks like in order to overclock you need
* MOBO that allows you to overclock ( assuming will cost a little more )
* more power supply ( add 10-15 bucks )
* Better RAM ( how much more increased cost or is most memory fine )
* better cooling ability ( be it water cooling / better heat shield / or more fans - which could mean more expensive casing + $20-100? )
My question is
For Gamers - who want a high end PC to push the limits of their $3,000 dollar system - I can see the marginal increases in components as a no brainer.
But for a mid range computer ( say 500-600 max for complete build )- is there a reasonable economic justification to overclock your CPU - if you are spendingi an additional 50-100 in parts - wouldn't that money be better spent on upgrading the CPU to a little higher speed?
Or am I misjudging something in my analysis????
Thanks
Looks like in order to overclock you need
* MOBO that allows you to overclock ( assuming will cost a little more )
* more power supply ( add 10-15 bucks )
* Better RAM ( how much more increased cost or is most memory fine )
* better cooling ability ( be it water cooling / better heat shield / or more fans - which could mean more expensive casing + $20-100? )
My question is
For Gamers - who want a high end PC to push the limits of their $3,000 dollar system - I can see the marginal increases in components as a no brainer.
But for a mid range computer ( say 500-600 max for complete build )- is there a reasonable economic justification to overclock your CPU - if you are spendingi an additional 50-100 in parts - wouldn't that money be better spent on upgrading the CPU to a little higher speed?
Or am I misjudging something in my analysis????
Thanks