p4 4.0 ghz

Some things to consider for big Ghz

If you're gonna have a CPU that is more than 4Ghz (5-6Ghz), than you should maybe put custom (higher capacity) voltage capacitors-etc. on your motherboard to not fry (or blow) it. Also, you would need a BEEFY power supply for maximum overclocking (maybe 550-600 watts to not worry?). :D
 
Last edited:
grimloch said:
i saw a 6.0 ghz cooled with liquid nitrogen, but it wasnt bench stable, not really any point getting a cpu thet high, as someone esle mentioned i would aslo prefer a 3.8 EE to a standard 4.0

there stable ~5.2-5.4GHz (most of the ones i seen) just awesome to see that kind of accomplishment, drom dudes in there garage tinkering with PC's lol.
 
Also, you would need a BEEFY power supply for maximum overclocking (maybe 550-600 watts to not worry?).
Why such high wattage? Especially when your proc never really uses more than 100W?
 
Why?

That's the day when I'll have 6 hardrives (with controller cards) DUAL CPU's at 6Ghz each, a PCIe 512MB video card, and 4 gigs of RAM for video editing (HUGE OVERCLOCKING with a big time water/anti-freeze cooling system, a BIG F****** 48" digital flat plasma computer monitor plugged into the power supply), platinum 7.1 surround sound card, TV Tuner Card, Gigabit Ethernet card, 1 DVD/combo +- burning drive, CD-RW drive, CD-Rom drive, 1 3.5" floppy drive, ENOUGH CASE LIGHTS TO HEAT UP AND LIGHT THE ENTIRE OFFICE IN THE DARK WINTER OF NEBRASKA, and 6 8cm fans in a BIG TOWER CASE :D :D ...... :o :P LOL
 
Last edited:
Harddrives kick in roughly 20W each.
Dual 6Ghz CPUs will punch in a total of no more than 200W
A 512MB video card wont use more than 100W
The RAM uses a negligable amout of power

A lot of people get stuck in "high wattage"-land :)
 
Praetor said:
A lot of people get stuck in "high wattage"-land :)

IT's usually crap rails that make people think they need a bigger PSU. "i jsut got this off-brand 500watter PSU cuz it was on sale for $50. It reboots my computer sometimes, especially in games. Do i need a 600watt?" i think 450watts is plenty, unless you are running multiple HD's, cd-burners, water-cooling, anything like a server. I'd rather just get 2*350watters with stable rails, than one overpriced 600watter.
 
Greg J. said:
See recent post just before Praetor, I added stuff, lol.

i'd still rather run 2 power supplies. cuts stress in half on rails, and you can provide power more directly to the parts that really need it like gfx, mobo...and use the other one for say hd's and cd-roms. i think its cheapers too.
 
See recent post just before Praetor, I added stuff, lol.
Most of the crap you've listed there WONT MATTER (especially the plasma screen as that will add exactlly 0W to the setup). It was a nice try tho :)

I'd rather just get 2*350watters with stable rails, than one overpriced 600watter.
Except dual/red. PSUs are uber-expensive :P
 
Even more is possible

Diamond processors in the future will be so powerful that silicon will melt.

Read this article that tells all about makers and manufacturing:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/diamond.html

Hmmm...6Ghz? Bah, more like 18 or 19 Ghz by the time we use real diamonds in the future. Hey, who said you couldn't have "bling-blingin' processors for CHEAP? :cool: :D (Hey, why not dual cores too?) Hmm...

Quote: "No, they're real," I tell him. "But they were made by a machine in Florida for less than a hundred dollars."

picture: (A microwave plasma tool at the Naval Research Lab, used to create diamonds for high-temperature semiconductor experiments.)
Weingarten shifts uncomfortably in his chair and stares at the glittering gems on his dining room table. "Unless they can be detected," he says, "these stones will bankrupt the industry."

Put pure carbon under enough heat and pressure - say, 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit and 50,000 atmospheres - and it will crystallize into the hardest material known.
 
Last edited:
Hey, who said you couldn't have "bling-blingin' processors for CHEAP?
Assuming we consider diamonds to be attractive.

try diamond heatsinks and stuff like that. take lots of heat...
They can take a lot of heat yes ... but they prolly dont take it well (i.e., it can absorb lots of heat but not fast enough to be useful ... much like the reason we all went from AL to CU)
 
Praetor said:
They can take a lot of heat yes ... but they prolly dont take it well (i.e., it can absorb lots of heat but not fast enough to be useful ... much like the reason we all went from AL to CU)

yah true...b4 the heatsink actually got rid of the heat, the core would have burst.
 
Back
Top