Ok, STARS, no offence but nothing you say makes sense. You say you don't have time to prove that your pictures are yours, but you do have time for lenghty argument and long posts. You seem not to know how to recognise a processed photography and you insist that you didn't, yet I can tell you (from almost 20 years of photographic experience) that they, in fact were processed. You provide a LOTS of additional info, that doesn't have anything to do with your a topic, but it does serve a purpose of covering that you really never answer any of the questions that were asked of you. And most worryingly, even the last pic you posted for the sky, can be found in 81 other locations, including the Tripwire Magazine and more! So you tell me, straight up, no distractions, no convoluted explanations, but do tell me, can you prove any of this is yours? Because so far, you are not making a believable case for yourself. Simple fact is, everytime I heard someone talk like you do,, they were lying. I am sorry but this is the truth. If you are now, it should make no offence to you to prove the photography is your work. PS. Camcoders don't take such detailed pictures my friend, not before, not now, not ever.