INTELCRAZY
banned
90nm Windsors running at 3.0ghz need 1.4. To get this FX to 3.0 and be stable I had to increase to 1.4. It defaulted to 1.35 stock
I had to put my E6850 at 1.4v to get to 3.74Ghz..... Good/Bad?
90nm Windsors running at 3.0ghz need 1.4. To get this FX to 3.0 and be stable I had to increase to 1.4. It defaulted to 1.35 stock
90nm Windsors running at 3.0ghz need 1.4. To get this FX to 3.0 and be stable I had to increase to 1.4. It defaulted to 1.35 stock
I had to put my E6850 at 1.4v to get to 3.74Ghz..... Good/Bad?
hmm well it didnt like it at all on the first boot, crashed shortly after i posted my last message, so went back to the bios and set it to auto again...
however CPU-z displays the voltage as 1.408V and PCwizard is saying its set to 1.350V?
90nm Windsors running at 3.0ghz need 1.4. To get this FX to 3.0 and be stable I had to increase to 1.4. It defaulted to 1.35 stock
just a quick point, PC probe 2 is firing up some warnings. Personally I dont generally take much notice of them but i'm not sure if they might be telling something..
CPU - NB HT voltage warning - 1.41
DDR2 Voltage warning - 1.98
Mines at 1.3v (stock) and im at 3.27ghz 100% stable, i had it at 3.33Ghz stable. But i hear the 5600 likes OC'ing better than the 6000, but i thought they were the same chip?
I think the X2 5400 or 5600 will clock better than the 6000 or FX with lesser voltage, you know there coming out with a X2 6400
Have you checked your Hypertransport Voltage and memory voltage to see if there at default