Ryan_Fpv
New Member
Does increasing the DRAM:FSB ratio increase the temperatures of your CPU? Or does changing the DRAM Frequency increase your CPU temperatures?
My mate keeps complaining that his Corsair Dominator Ram only runs at 1066mhz instead of the 1866mhz that it is supposed to run at. I keep telling him to go into the bios and change the DRAM:FSB ratio (or the DRAM Frequency since his Asus bios doesn't seem to have DRAM:FSB ratio settings), however he refuses to do it because he says changing it puts his CPU temperature at 60*C on idle*. (*that was when he used the XMP setting which increases both memory frequency and CPU bclk frequency, however he still claims he can't change his memory frequency without it putting his CPU temps into dangerous zones)
I decided to run a little test with my PC to see if CPU temps do increase when the memory frequency is increased. I'm using the rig in my sig below, CPU running @ 21x 166Mhz bclk with CoolerMaster Hyper TX3 heatsink.
Here are the results (idle temps):
DRAM @1660Mhz (DRAM:FSB @ 10:2)
CPU 30 °C
Core #1 42 °C
Core #2 36 °C
Core #3 40 °C
Core #4 36 °C
DIMM Voltage: 1.62V
DRAM @1328Mhz (DRAM:FSB @ 8:2)
CPU 30 °C
Core #1 41 °C
Core #2 36 °C
Core #3 40 °C
Core #4 35 °C
DIMM Voltage: 1.57V
DRAM @996Mhz (DRAM:FSB @ 6:2)
CPU 31 °C
Core #1 43 °C
Core #2 38 °C
Core #3 41 °C
Core #4 37 °C
DIMM Voltage: 1.54V
Now, my CPU temps are coming out (relatively) the same. On all ram frequencies CPU core temps were an average of about 65*C during prime95. I'm sure with the voltages up that the RAM itself will be running hotter, but that's not the issue.
So, is it accurate in saying that increasing the DRAM:FSB or Dram Frequency does not increase the CPU temperature?
Or is my friend correct in saying "1866 mhz required more frequency to be pushed through the cpu circuitory motherboard ram and increases the temperature of everything"?
My mate keeps complaining that his Corsair Dominator Ram only runs at 1066mhz instead of the 1866mhz that it is supposed to run at. I keep telling him to go into the bios and change the DRAM:FSB ratio (or the DRAM Frequency since his Asus bios doesn't seem to have DRAM:FSB ratio settings), however he refuses to do it because he says changing it puts his CPU temperature at 60*C on idle*. (*that was when he used the XMP setting which increases both memory frequency and CPU bclk frequency, however he still claims he can't change his memory frequency without it putting his CPU temps into dangerous zones)
I decided to run a little test with my PC to see if CPU temps do increase when the memory frequency is increased. I'm using the rig in my sig below, CPU running @ 21x 166Mhz bclk with CoolerMaster Hyper TX3 heatsink.
Here are the results (idle temps):
DRAM @1660Mhz (DRAM:FSB @ 10:2)
CPU 30 °C
Core #1 42 °C
Core #2 36 °C
Core #3 40 °C
Core #4 36 °C
DIMM Voltage: 1.62V
DRAM @1328Mhz (DRAM:FSB @ 8:2)
CPU 30 °C
Core #1 41 °C
Core #2 36 °C
Core #3 40 °C
Core #4 35 °C
DIMM Voltage: 1.57V
DRAM @996Mhz (DRAM:FSB @ 6:2)
CPU 31 °C
Core #1 43 °C
Core #2 38 °C
Core #3 41 °C
Core #4 37 °C
DIMM Voltage: 1.54V
Now, my CPU temps are coming out (relatively) the same. On all ram frequencies CPU core temps were an average of about 65*C during prime95. I'm sure with the voltages up that the RAM itself will be running hotter, but that's not the issue.
So, is it accurate in saying that increasing the DRAM:FSB or Dram Frequency does not increase the CPU temperature?
Or is my friend correct in saying "1866 mhz required more frequency to be pushed through the cpu circuitory motherboard ram and increases the temperature of everything"?