I'm looking to upgrade from what I currently have and don't want to spend a lot of money (less than $400). Basically, I'm torn between just buying a decent computer for $300 (I found one at Office Depot with an Allendale E2180 2.0 dual core, 2 GB of memory, Vista Premium, etc) that would fit my needs well (which basically are surfing the internet, word processing, and some multimedia) or building my own computer from parts with the same Allendale E2180 processor, a cheap motherboard that I can overclock, 2 GB of memory, a decent video card, a good power supply, and a SATA hard drive with about 500GB. I already have the case and a DVD drive. I figure once I get all of the parts, it will cost around the same as the computer in the store (an Acer AM1641) but will be better, because it will have a bigger hard drive and I will be able to overclock the system to get better performance out of it.
To go into more detail, here are the specs for the Acer:
E2180 2.0ghz processor
2GB DDR2 667 RAM
320GB hard drive
DVD multiburner
8 in 1 card reader
6 USB 2.0 ports
Graphics integrated with the motherboard
Windows Vista with SP1
And for the computer I would build:
E2180 2.0ghz processor likely overclocked to 2.2-3.0ghz depending on cooling requirements
2GB DDR2 667 or 800 RAM
500 GB SATA hard drive
DVD multiburner
4-6 USB 2.0 ports (what the case has)
A mid range graphics card (maybe 256MB)
Windows XP/Linux dual boot
I should also add that the Acer will need a graphics card as well, so that likely bumps up the total at least $50 to about $350 plus tax. I will also be dual booting Windows XP and Windows Vista if I get the Acer.
I guess I'm torn for a few reasons. On the one hand, I want to buy the Acer because it's close to the specs that I want, has Windows Vista, would only require a graphics card, and most importantly, is ready to use right out of the box.
On the other hand, I want to build my own computer because it would be more powerful, would probably be cheaper, would have the components that I want in it, and choosing the motherboard would allow me flexibility if I want to upgrade it in the future.
I guess the main thing I'm having trouble deciding is whether I want to go for the instant gratification and get the less powerful Acer, or invest the time necessary to carefully select the parts that I want, have them shipped to my house, and then build the computer. I'm sure I can build the computer, so that's not an issue, it's just that I've wanted a new computer for a long time and don't know if I want to wait for all of the parts to get here and build it or just buy the computer and take a performance hit since I won't be able to overclock the Acer motherboard (the E2180 is still a pretty decent processor, considering I won't be doing any heavy gaming).
I also want to try out Windows Vista as well. I have experience with it, but I want to see what it's like on a day to day basis, but I don't know if I want to spend maybe an extra $100 and take the performance hit just for Windows Vista. One last complicating factor is the fact that if I buy the Acer I will want to dual boot it with Windows XP, and I don't know if I will be able to find the drivers for XP for the computer. Also, I will probably add a Linux distro to the Acer as well, but that's not really an issue, as I will do that with either computer.
This is a lot of stuff to go through, but if anyone actually read this and has an opinion on what I should do, it would be appreciated.
To go into more detail, here are the specs for the Acer:
E2180 2.0ghz processor
2GB DDR2 667 RAM
320GB hard drive
DVD multiburner
8 in 1 card reader
6 USB 2.0 ports
Graphics integrated with the motherboard
Windows Vista with SP1
And for the computer I would build:
E2180 2.0ghz processor likely overclocked to 2.2-3.0ghz depending on cooling requirements
2GB DDR2 667 or 800 RAM
500 GB SATA hard drive
DVD multiburner
4-6 USB 2.0 ports (what the case has)
A mid range graphics card (maybe 256MB)
Windows XP/Linux dual boot
I should also add that the Acer will need a graphics card as well, so that likely bumps up the total at least $50 to about $350 plus tax. I will also be dual booting Windows XP and Windows Vista if I get the Acer.
I guess I'm torn for a few reasons. On the one hand, I want to buy the Acer because it's close to the specs that I want, has Windows Vista, would only require a graphics card, and most importantly, is ready to use right out of the box.
On the other hand, I want to build my own computer because it would be more powerful, would probably be cheaper, would have the components that I want in it, and choosing the motherboard would allow me flexibility if I want to upgrade it in the future.
I guess the main thing I'm having trouble deciding is whether I want to go for the instant gratification and get the less powerful Acer, or invest the time necessary to carefully select the parts that I want, have them shipped to my house, and then build the computer. I'm sure I can build the computer, so that's not an issue, it's just that I've wanted a new computer for a long time and don't know if I want to wait for all of the parts to get here and build it or just buy the computer and take a performance hit since I won't be able to overclock the Acer motherboard (the E2180 is still a pretty decent processor, considering I won't be doing any heavy gaming).
I also want to try out Windows Vista as well. I have experience with it, but I want to see what it's like on a day to day basis, but I don't know if I want to spend maybe an extra $100 and take the performance hit just for Windows Vista. One last complicating factor is the fact that if I buy the Acer I will want to dual boot it with Windows XP, and I don't know if I will be able to find the drivers for XP for the computer. Also, I will probably add a Linux distro to the Acer as well, but that's not really an issue, as I will do that with either computer.
This is a lot of stuff to go through, but if anyone actually read this and has an opinion on what I should do, it would be appreciated.