Starman*
New Member
Re Magicman, I made it quite clear what could be copied and could not. Expanding, items that you can do what you like with are your own creations, the creations of your production company, video issued copyright-free such as promos / advertising / freeware (subject to distribution conditions and you probably aren't permitted to edit), video for which you have bought the rights.
Your quote: "You don't have to copy a disk for it to be illegal. As has already been stated, breaching the copy protection is illegal by itself" was covered by several of my statements taken as a whole.
Re someone having to justify their video, why should they? If someone asks a question on printing you don't expect them to declare that they're not printing banknotes. The crux of the matter is what information you provide (see my previous post).
In another forum, there was a post "how could I copy a dvd with a single burner". According to you, they would have to tell you what they were doing. Why? The procedure is in the Nero manual. It's not black art.
Re accusing someone of illegal activities I stand by my comments 100%. Even if 95% of the people copying dvds are doing so illegally, a responder has no right making an unwarranted accusation because they may be addressing one of the 5%.
As far as I am concerned, if there is any mention of copyrights, wrong-doing etc etc it should be done in a diplomatic, informative and non-accusing manner.
On a slightly different tack there is the question of backing up dvds in case of damage. Anyone with kids understands that one. You (magicman) stated that any breaking of copy protection is illegal. That's one reason a number of software companies have been waging legal battles against the DMCA. I guess the argument is that you have a right to protect your (very fragile) investment. I don't know where that stands right now.
Starman*
Your quote: "You don't have to copy a disk for it to be illegal. As has already been stated, breaching the copy protection is illegal by itself" was covered by several of my statements taken as a whole.
Re someone having to justify their video, why should they? If someone asks a question on printing you don't expect them to declare that they're not printing banknotes. The crux of the matter is what information you provide (see my previous post).
In another forum, there was a post "how could I copy a dvd with a single burner". According to you, they would have to tell you what they were doing. Why? The procedure is in the Nero manual. It's not black art.
Re accusing someone of illegal activities I stand by my comments 100%. Even if 95% of the people copying dvds are doing so illegally, a responder has no right making an unwarranted accusation because they may be addressing one of the 5%.
As far as I am concerned, if there is any mention of copyrights, wrong-doing etc etc it should be done in a diplomatic, informative and non-accusing manner.
On a slightly different tack there is the question of backing up dvds in case of damage. Anyone with kids understands that one. You (magicman) stated that any breaking of copy protection is illegal. That's one reason a number of software companies have been waging legal battles against the DMCA. I guess the argument is that you have a right to protect your (very fragile) investment. I don't know where that stands right now.
Starman*