Stats/Specs

JTM

New Member
Here is my computer, it's a family computer etc. I don't have my own, but are these specs really that bad?

Motherboard Name Intel Pendleton 2 D845EPT2
Front Side Bus Properties:
Bus Type Intel NetBurst
Bus Width 64-bit
Real Clock 133 MHz (QDR)
Effective Clock 533 MHz
Bandwidth 4267 MB/s

Memory Bus Properties:
Bus Type DDR SDRAM
Bus Width 64-bit
Real Clock 133 MHz (DDR)
Effective Clock 267 MHz
Bandwidth 2133 MB/s

Physical Memory:
Total 254 MB
Used 199 MB
Free 55 MB
Utilization 78 %

Swap Space:
Total 625 MB
Used 281 MB
Free 343 MB
Utilization 45 %

Virtual Memory:
Total 880 MB
Used 481 MB
Free 399 MB
Utilization 55 %

Physical Address Extension (PAE):
Supported by Operating System Yes
Supported by CPU Yes
Active No

Motherboard:
CPU Type Intel Pentium 4, 2400 MHz (18 x 133)
Motherboard Name Intel Pendleton 2 D845EPT2 (3 PCI, 1 AGP, 2 DIMM, Audio)
Motherboard Chipset Intel Brookdale i845E
System Memory 256 MB (PC2100 DDR SDRAM)
BIOS Type AMI (07/18/02)
Display:
Video Adapter NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 (64 MB)
3D Accelerator nVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
Monitor Dell E772c [17" CRT] (6418028F02J1)

Multimedia:
Audio Adapter Intel 82801DB ICH4 - AC'97 Audio Controller [A-1]

Storage:
IDE Controller Intel(R) 82801DB Ultra ATA Storage Controller - 24CB
Floppy Drive Floppy disk drive
Disk Drive MAXTOR 6L040J2 (40 GB, 7200 RPM, Ultra-ATA/133)
Optical Drive HL-DT-ST CD-ROM GCR-8481B (48x CD-ROM)
Optical Drive HL-DT-ST CD-RW GCE-8400B (40x/12x/40x CD-RW)
SMART Hard Disks Status OK

Is there anything I should do to speed it up etc. I no it needs Ram etc.
 
You have very little RAM and the GPU is very low end. I don't know as much about Intel as I do AMD, but that's an older Pentium 4 so slower than one today that runs at around the same speed.

If it had more RAM and a better GPU, it actually wouldn't be too bad...
 
That's not too bad a CPU I suppose, but the fact that they crippled it with SDRAM is hideous. They choked the life out of it.
 
Its not to bad of a computer for internet or word. But you need to upgrade the ram to 512 if it is running XP. And if you want to game on it i would upgrade the GPU but it still wouldnd be able to handle much. But it all depends on what you are using it for.
 
Its not to bad of a computer for internet or word. But you need to upgrade the ram to 512 if it is running XP. And if you want to game on it i would upgrade the GPU but it still wouldnd be able to handle much. But it all depends on what you are using it for.

I would recommend it to, but I remember my old Compaq 1.1Ghz Celeron that had 256MB SDRAM. I had Win XP installed and I played UT2004 with it :D
 
[-0MEGA-];403917 said:
I would recommend it to, but I remember my old Compaq 1.1Ghz Celeron that had 256MB SDRAM. I had Win XP installed and I played UT2004 with it :D


Isnt that a graphics demanding game? How did you manage that did it play smoothly and what settings did you play it on and what graphics card did you have.
 
Back
Top