Hi
I have Rainmeter installed on my Windows PC, and it shows info on my desktop, info like CPU usage and RAM usage, which is what I got it for (I like how Mac's have this always displayed at the top). It also is displaying something I which sounded vaguely familiar but which I don't much know about called SWAP usage, and I noticed that my SWAP usage is usually really high, sometimes even 100% and usually much higher than RAM which tends to be at 65%ish. My CPU probably isn't important but is low, at under 30% right now.
I'm wondering if this SWAP is too high. Can't seem to find much info on SWAP that I understand. >.< Google searches tend to bring about info about Linux and networks and stuff.
My computer is often really slow to wake up and to run in generally. Seems to be more so since I updated from XP to W7. I only have 2GB RAM, I would buy more but I'm thinking up upgrading to 64bit if the copy I own will allow it and that will depend on how much RAM I buy. It's more expensive for my machine because it's DDR I think. Is my low RAM the issue?
Thanks.
I have Rainmeter installed on my Windows PC, and it shows info on my desktop, info like CPU usage and RAM usage, which is what I got it for (I like how Mac's have this always displayed at the top). It also is displaying something I which sounded vaguely familiar but which I don't much know about called SWAP usage, and I noticed that my SWAP usage is usually really high, sometimes even 100% and usually much higher than RAM which tends to be at 65%ish. My CPU probably isn't important but is low, at under 30% right now.
I'm wondering if this SWAP is too high. Can't seem to find much info on SWAP that I understand. >.< Google searches tend to bring about info about Linux and networks and stuff.
My computer is often really slow to wake up and to run in generally. Seems to be more so since I updated from XP to W7. I only have 2GB RAM, I would buy more but I'm thinking up upgrading to 64bit if the copy I own will allow it and that will depend on how much RAM I buy. It's more expensive for my machine because it's DDR I think. Is my low RAM the issue?
Thanks.
Last edited: