Thought this was funny...

TheChef

New Member
At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating, "If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they painted new lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car unless you bought "CarNT," but then you would have to buy more seats.

6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive -- but it would only run on five percent of the roads.

7. The oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "general protection fault" warning light.

8. The airbag system would ask, "Are you sure?" before deploying.

9. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the antenna.

10. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally Road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50 percent or more. Moreover, GM would become a target for investigation by the Justice Department.

11. Every time GM introduced a new car, car buyers would have to learn to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

12. You'd have to press the "start" button to turn the engine off.
 
hilarious!
i liked the one about the airbag asking "are you sure?"
just gives you an idea at how you have to look at different technologies in different ways.
Also makes you think at how ridiculous some things that computers do are.
 
ROFLMFAO, thats very true... But this only concerns Microsoft, cause we all know that it sucks, and that we only use it cause it has the best compatibility.
 
12. You'd have to press the "start" button to turn the engine off.
Its remarks like that that made Microsoft decide to remove start from the start button on the Longhorn OS. Now its just the button which will make it a lot more difficult to give instructions to users that are computerphobes.
 
quite funny, but the mac one made me angry. macs really aint that great/much better. sure if u want to do video editing, got grab yourselft a mac, but otherwise, stick with the, in my opinion (contrary to what this GM thing said), easier to use, more intuitive interface of windows.
 
2. Every time they painted new lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.
That wouldnt matter if the cars were only 25 bucks

5. Only one person at a time could use the car unless you bought "CarNT," but then you would have to buy more seats.
Wut are they trying to prove their. Only one person can drive a car at a time. If they consider passengers then on a computer you can consider the people who watch who is on.

cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon.
Tha'd be the day :rolleyes:

Rofl but it is all true (except that macs are better)
I think most of us would agree on that :D

Lol that was a good source of entertainment
 
Back
Top