Top 10 AMD processors?

[Pc_Pimp]

I was just wondering what are the top ten AMD processors as far as performance?

 

[fade2green514]

the higher the frequency the better. depending on what you plan on doing, dual core or single core might be better.

 

[Bobo]

FX-62
FX-60
X2 5000
X2 4800
X2 4600
X2 4400
X2 4200
X2 4000
X2 3800
A64 4000 or X2 3500

I don't know where Optys factor into that, but nobody really uses them anyway for a regular computer, so who cares

 

[WeatherMan]

What?!!

Many people use Optys for gaming rigs and things like that, there great overclockers and thats why people get drawn to them.

And BTW... X2 3500?

 

[Shady]

i guess he didn't mean to write X2
because there is 4000 single core and 3500 of course is single

 

[Bobo]

What?!!

Many people use Optys for gaming rigs and things like that, there great overclockers and thats why people get drawn to them.

And BTW... X2 3500?

There are no AM2 Optys, that is why I really didn't include them.

i guess he didn't mean to write X2
because there is 4000 single core and 3500 of course is single

No I meant it ^^^

 

[Dr Studly]

FX-62
FX-60
X2 5000
X2 4800
X2 4600
X2 4400
X2 4200
X2 4000
X2 3800
A64 4000 or X2 3500

I don't know where Optys factor into that, but nobody really uses them anyway for a regular computer, so who cares

i wus under the impression that the X2 5000 was better then the FX-60... o well...

 

[Bobo]

i wus under the impression that the X2 5000 was better then the FX-60... o well...

It might be (if so, then only slightly) in stock performance. But the FXes are all incredible overclockers.

 

[Shady]

No I meant it ^^^
__________________

wow .. i didn't know there was a dual core 3500+

 

[Bobo]

wow .. i didn't know there was a dual core 3500+

I just can't find that it exists anywhere. Nobody sells it that i know of

 

[Dr Studly]

It might be (if so, then only slightly) in stock performance. But the FXes are all incredible overclockers.

you could build a better system using a 5000 then using a 60
cus they better platform offers a increase... not a huge increase, but when u put in the better mobos, the best ram, it will be better then the best u can do with a 60

 

[Bobo]

How is the platform different? You could use the exact same parts.

 

[Pc_Pimp]

the higher the frequency the better. depending on what you plan on doing, dual core or single core might be better.

Gaming mainly

 

[fade2green514]

generally dual core has no real disadvantage besides price... but most games only use one core as of right now. quake 4 uses two cores, normally 75%-100% of my cpu, i know that.

 

[Maddhatter]

the listing of a dual core 3500+ is likely a misprint..even trying to google it doesn't bring up results for it

 

[34erd]

Theres a dual core 3600+.

 

[bball4life]

wow .. i didn't know there was a dual core 3500+

There may not be one out yet. They are the energy efficient cpus that I don't even know if amd has officially released.