Hi all,
I'm new in these woods and I dont know how to start a new thread ( or even if I'm allowed to ) so I thought I'd hijack this poor guy's post since my question is closely related. I hope he doesnt get too pissed.
I have a awfully old system and I thought I really should upgrade. It came as a shock to find out that just choosing a suitable processor is now so complicated that it needs an expensive processor to work out which one. Ironic, or what?
I found a bewildering variety of systems for sale, but choosing between them is a nightmare. Eventually, I came across some expert who advised building your own, so that you can choose what's important to you. I think he's right. However, it came down ( as it always does ) to the operating system. The reason bought systems are better value is that you get the OS provided and they get it cheap.
Microsoft's OS is really tricky IMO. Vista is reckoned to be a bit 'bloated' and '7' is a bit new to call. Or so they say. I actually have a copy of XP professional I can load myself. Are Vista and '7' that much better. I'm no high-end user, but I'm no a dummy and dont need to be spoon-fed, a criticism I've heard about '7', or maybe it was Vista.
I've been tempted to get Ubuntu, but I hear that there is a lot of software you cant use. How important that is, I cant tell.
I wondered if I could have 2 OS; XP on one HDD and Ubuntu on another. It seems I can!Would it be OK to back stuff from either HDD onto the SAME external HDD?
But how do people feel about XP, Vista and '7'. Would my life not be complete until I upgraded from XP, or are the benefits of the new Microsoft OS simply not necessary. I mostly do surfing; digital pics with the odd video. Nothing processor/graphics intensive AFAIK.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Regards
bruce