Ubuntu 64-bit...

First off, will I be able to run the 64-bit on my old system? P4 541, DG965WH, 1gb 800Mhz RAM, X1300PRO. I took one of my old HDD's and rigged it up, a Maxtor 20Gb. I plan on buying an 80Gb SATA.

I am hooking this up to my TV via S-video....


What are the pros and cons of 64-bit Ubuntu?



Thanks
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(Linux_distribution)

as far as linux distros are concerned, ubuntu is kind of a kids version...

Kind of dumbed down and fairly useless. I mean it does what it does, but some peopel will know what I am saying.

Well, I agree with you that Ubuntu does lack some features that are desired in a good streamlined OS, however stating that it is useless is completely giving out the wrong information on the subject. Ubuntu is linux, and under the hood it runs Linux. Meaning you can run just about any Linux based app on it that you could with any other distro out there. I would say you probably meant is minimalistic, which IMO makes a better OS anyways. However, Debian based Linux distros do some things that don't quite make sense to me. However, Ubuntu is by no means a useless operating system, and it has done some great things for Linux and the Linux communities.

First off, will I be able to run the 64-bit on my old system? P4 541, DG965WH, 1gb 800Mhz RAM, X1300PRO. I took one of my old HDD's and rigged it up, a Maxtor 20Gb. I plan on buying an 80Gb SATA.
Nope, Intel's first 64bit desktop processor was the Core 2 Duo ( I believe, someone correct me if I am wrong). So you will need to go with the 32bit version.

I am hooking this up to my TV via S-video....

Are you planning on ever recording TV, if so I highly recommend Myth TV, which runs on Linux.

www.mythtv.org

What are the pros and cons of 64-bit Ubuntu?

Well the pros would be it has higher memory addressing abilities, and can utilize higher end hardware. Other than that, there is really no big difference. You may run into some compatibility problems with legacy (32bit apps) on a 64bit system. However, most things that you might want to use will be updated to support 64bit architecture.
 
Well, I agree with you that Ubuntu does lack some features that are desired in a good streamlined OS, however stating that it is useless is completely giving out the wrong information on the subject. Ubuntu is linux, and under the hood it runs Linux. Meaning you can run just about any Linux based app on it that you could with any other distro out there. I would say you probably meant is minimalistic, which IMO makes a better OS anyways. However, Debian based Linux distros do some things that don't quite make sense to me. However, Ubuntu is by no means a useless operating system, and it has done some great things for Linux and the Linux communities.


Nope, Intel's first 64bit desktop processor was the Core 2 Duo ( I believe, someone correct me if I am wrong). So you will need to go with the 32bit version.



Are you planning on ever recording TV, if so I highly recommend Myth TV, which runs on Linux.

www.mythtv.org



Well the pros would be it has higher memory addressing abilities, and can utilize higher end hardware. Other than that, there is really no big difference. You may run into some compatibility problems with legacy (32bit apps) on a 64bit system. However, most things that you might want to use will be updated to support 64bit architecture.

Someone else on the forum told me since it was "EM64T" that it would run 64-bit.
 
First off, will I be able to run the 64-bit on my old system? P4 541, DG965WH, 1gb 800Mhz RAM, X1300PRO. I took one of my old HDD's and rigged it up, a Maxtor 20Gb. I plan on buying an 80Gb SATA.

I am hooking this up to my TV via S-video....


What are the pros and cons of 64-bit Ubuntu?



Thanks
no
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(Linux_distribution)

as far as linux distros are concerned, ubuntu is kind of a kids version...

Kind of dumbed down and fairly useless. I mean it does what it does, but some peopel will know what I am saying.
Sabayon>others

Well, I agree with you that Ubuntu does lack some features that are desired in a good streamlined OS, however stating that it is useless is completely giving out the wrong information on the subject. Ubuntu is linux, and under the hood it runs Linux. Meaning you can run just about any Linux based app on it that you could with any other distro out there. I would say you probably meant is minimalistic, which IMO makes a better OS anyways. However, Debian based Linux distros do some things that don't quite make sense to me. However, Ubuntu is by no means a useless operating system, and it has done some great things for Linux and the Linux communities.
Again, Sabayon>all

Nope, Intel's first 64bit desktop processor was the Core 2 Duo ( I believe, someone correct me if I am wrong). So you will need to go with the 32bit version.
no, it was the 6XX line...


Well the pros would be it has higher memory addressing abilities, and can utilize higher end hardware. Other than that, there is really no big difference. You may run into some compatibility problems with legacy (32bit apps) on a 64bit system. However, most things that you might want to use will be updated to support 64bit architecture.
Yup
Someone else on the forum told me since it was "EM64T" that it would run 64-bit.
it's not.
Pentium Extreme Edition and Pentium D were the first 64 bit..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-Bit_Processor
and the 6XX line?
Okay, yes that is right, I get confused because the first gen core duos were not 64 bit, but the Core 2 Duos are. I forgot about the extreme P4s.

yup...
 
Probably need to start a new thread on this but I'm interested to know why you believe that Ubuntu is a kids version - dumbed down and useless?
 
Yeah but in what way?

I can only guess that you're basing it on ease of use, which I don't think is a bad thing at all.

I've used a fair few distros and BSD, but came back to Ubuntu.
 
well it does make a difference you know. And on top of that, Solaris and BSD are two different sets of operating systems as well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top