What do you think?

smithw14

New Member
Hi all! I am in the market for a new computer, and before my purchase, wanted a little advice. I have to go with Dell, because the company I work for offers interest free loans with Dell. So I have done a bit of research and priced a system.

First - my needs. This computer is used at my home. I use it primarily for internet applications and business applications (websurfing, downloading, email, word, excel). I multi-task like no other. Multiple applications opened at once, internet surfing, downloading, and uploading (always multiple sites at once). I do a little bit of gaming (Microsoft FSX is really all I play as of right now). I don’t really use any graphics or design applications.

On my current computer, I currently have about 150GB of HD space used – and have never gone over this amount.

What I am looking for is SPEED. With the multiple things I am doing at once, I want a computer that will perform (and run Vista with ease). I want to be able to finally play Microsoft FSX with the graphics turned up all the way! (My Pentium 4 1.70GHz with NVIDIA GeForce 2 MX/MX 400 isn’t cutting it!). I want something that will last a good number of years, is reliable, and upgradeable. Well, I think that about sums it up. Here is what I came up with. I have added some “options” of other things I could go with in sections where I particularly want feedback:


Dell XPS 630

• Intel® Core™2 Q6600 Quad-Core (8MB L2 cache,2.40GHz,1066FSB)
OPTION:
Intel Core2 Extreme QX6850 (8MB,3.0GHz, 1333FSB) +$950 (For this pricetag I don’t think its worth it).

• Windows Vista Home Premium

• 4GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 SDRAM 800MHz -4 DIMMs
OPTION:
Can downgrade to 2GB Corsair or get generic 4, 3, 2 GB DDR2 at either 800MHz or 667MHz

• 500GB - 7200RPM, SATA 3.0Gb/s, 16MB Cache
OPTIONS:
750GB - 7200RPM, SATA 3.0Gb/s, 16MB Cache [add $100]
160GB - 10K RPM, SATA 3.0Gb/s, 16MB Cache [add $100]
500GB Data Security RAID 1 (2 x 500GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs) [add $180]
1TB Data Security RAID 1 (2 x 1TB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs) [add $720]
500GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 250GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs) [add $20]
1TB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 500GB SATA 3Gb/s 7200 RPM HDDs) [add $180]
320GB Performance RAID 0 (2 x 160GB 10K RPM, SATA 3.0Gb/s, 16MB Cache [add $300

• Single Drive: 16X CD/DVD burner (DVD+/-RW) w/double layer write capability. ( I could get blue ray for $230-$300 more – but I just don’t see the need right now).

• 24 inch UltraSharp™ 2408WFP Widescreen Digital Flat Panel

• nVidia® GeForce® 8800 GTX 768MB
OPTION:
Can get Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GT 512MB for $100 less

• Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic (D) Sound Card

• Dell 19 in 1 Media Reader with Bluetooth

• Microsoft Office Small Business

TOTAL COST: $3,298


I can add a AGEIA physics accelerator for $160. I don’t think I really need this. I may have totally overdone this system build for my needs, left out a few things, or got it just right! Ha – who knows.

Thanks in advance for any and all suggestions and advice!


William
 
Have you considered building your own? You can get better components a lot cheaper. You'll also give yourself an easy upgrade path for the future.

Exactly. Plus, why DELL. They are pretty close to the worst pc's you can get.
 
Wow - ha ha - thanks everybody for your speedy replies. Somehow I knew the word "Dell" would get things flaring up! I'm not a huge Dell fan myself, but like I mentioned, my company offers a computer purchase program through them with an interest free loan, so thats why its Dell.

No, it has not even crossed my mind to build my own computer. Simply because I don't think I could successfully do it (or really want to). I'm fairly proficient with computers and technology in general, and can use them and troubleshoot computer problems pretty decently. But as far as the inner workings, I can add some memory, but thats about it! :) And plus, being my own tech support if something goes wrong just sucks even more than calling Dell. lol
 
If you're totally oppossed to the building-your-own option, I'd go for 4GB of the DDR2 800 generic RAM (the Dominator is a rip-off; you can always buy your own outside of dell), the Dual 8800 GT option and the Q6600.

The size of HD is up to you and I wouldn't get the Physics card.
 
Wow - ha ha - thanks everybody for your speedy replies. Somehow I knew the word "Dell" would get things flaring up! I'm not a huge Dell fan myself, but like I mentioned, my company offers a computer purchase program through them with an interest free loan, so thats why its Dell.

No, it has not even crossed my mind to build my own computer. Simply because I don't think I could successfully do it (or really want to). I'm fairly proficient with computers and technology in general, and can use them and troubleshoot computer problems pretty decently. But as far as the inner workings, I can add some memory, but thats about it! :) And plus, being my own tech support if something goes wrong just sucks even more than calling Dell. lol

Now I think we all understand you. It is def a good build. Kinda pricey but atleast you dont have to build it. I look forward to hearing more from you. If something happens or your having difficulties, I speak for eveyone and say that we can all help out.
 
Awesome awesome. Thanks again for the replies. Mep916 - - ok, so corsair is a ripoff, eh? I was wondering about that. I'll strike it off the list and go with the generic.

Ok, now I'm intrigued. So a dual GeForce GT 512MB is better than the single GTX 768MB? Interesting. So when would one prefer the GTX in their system?

I'll stick with the 6600 processor (and keep the $950!). From the limited online research I had done, the QX6850 is more relevant for graphics heavy applications like photoshop and the like, or for people with deep pockets?? I also think I read something about the fact that there aren't that many software programs out there that can utilize all the different "cores" or whatnot that would theoretically make the program run faster. Is that correct? (minus the layman's jargon of course!)

g25racer - thanks, I appreciate the welcoming atmosphere from you and everyone else! I'm definitely taking my computer questions to this site from here on out!
 
Awesome awesome. Thanks again for the replies. Mep916 - - ok, so corsair is a ripoff, eh? I was wondering about that. I'll strike it off the list and go with the generic.

Ok, now I'm intrigued. So a dual GeForce GT 512MB is better than the single GTX 768MB? Interesting. So when would one prefer the GTX in their system?

I'll stick with the 6600 processor (and keep the $950!). From the limited online research I had done, the QX6850 is more relevant for graphics heavy applications like photoshop and the like, or for people with deep pockets?? I also think I read something about the fact that there aren't that many software programs out there that can utilize all the different "cores" or whatnot that would theoretically make the program run faster. Is that correct? (minus the layman's jargon of course!)

g25racer - thanks, I appreciate the welcoming atmosphere from you and everyone else! I'm definitely taking my computer questions to this site from here on out!

Welcome to the Family! LOL
 
If you're sure you don't want to build it yourself...

Anyway go for the dual 8800 GT's. Don't get the physX card as nVidia bought AGEIA and will allow for the graphics card to act as one with a driver update. (Hopefully soon!) Most games don't use PhysX really....
 
If you're sure you don't want to build it yourself...

Anyway go for the dual 8800 GT's. Don't get the physX card as nVidia bought AGEIA and will allow for the graphics card to act as one with a driver update. (Hopefully soon!) Most games don't use PhysX really....

Thanks for your input! I am curious as to why the GT over the GTX?


William
 
Prob b/c its cheaper and when newer drivers come out, sli will be even better and run better with newer games.
 
Mep916 - - ok, so corsair is a ripoff, eh? I was wondering about that. I'll strike it off the list and go with the generic.

Wait, the brand "Corsair" is not the ripoff. They make this series called "DOMINATOR" which really don't dominate that much I guess! :P But Corsair memory are really good. Just following mep's advice, don't get the "DOMINATOR" series of that brand. The other type of Corsair memory is called "XMS2". That's what you wanna get. I don't know if they sell it at Dell. If not I guess you could stick with the generic until you fell your comp is kinda slow. :)

Ok, now I'm intrigued. So a dual GeForce GT 512MB is better than the single GTX 768MB? Interesting. So when would one prefer the GTX in their system?

The dual 8800GT 512MB are a bit faster. You would want to get the 8800GTX when you don't have the 600W it takes to do dual 8800GT's but I don't think that's a problem cause you're getting prebuild. In other words go with the dual GT's. ;)

And yeah, don't waste your money on the expensive processor and stick with the Q6600. If you ever want to upgrade from the Q6600, theres the new Q9xxx series that just came out for a third of the price of that $950+ CPU. ;)
 
ok, so corsair is a ripoff, eh? I was wondering about that. I'll strike it off the list and go with the generic.

The price Dell is charging for the Dominator is too high. Corsair is actually a great brand and their Dominator series is among the best. Basically I'm saying that you could go with the generic for now, and purchase some Dominator at a significantly lower price from newegg.com (or elsewhere) in the future.

Ok, now I'm intrigued. So a dual GeForce GT 512MB is better than the single GTX 768MB? Interesting. So when would one prefer the GTX in their system?

The GTX is $100 more, while the dual 8800 GT setup is included in the price. The GTX is a great card, but I think the SLi setup performs better, in some cases. I don't feel like digging up the benchmarks. :P
 
Great! Thanks again everybody. You guys have collectively saved me $1,340! I'll take ya out to lunch sometime!!!

I'll keep you posted. . . .


William
 
Back
Top