What is the best you could build for a budget?


Well its has intels top Intel Core 2 Extreme and amd still out performs...


Ok let's put it this way. Core 2 Duo E6600 processor beats AMD FX-60's in almost everything out there. By the way, E6600 cost about $330 on newegg.

Try these on for size...
pcmark%20overall.gif


pc-mark-cpu.gif


pcmark-graphic.gif


from http://xtreview.com

divx.png


itunes.png


from http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=794&cid=1
 
Prove it, go away and look at some recent benchmarks, emphasis on the intel core 2 duo (stock) beating an overclocked FX-60. Stop living in the past ya fanboy.

Thats completely circumstancial. What hard drives, what arrangement, prove it, pick out the 4 drives and the 1 drive and physically prove it. It may be the case, but still, that comment meant nothing and wasnt backed up at all.

dragon

*EDIT* - and stop double posting it annoys people such as the admins and mods. theres an big edit button there for a reason

I dont have the reasources to buy hard drives to do a bench test but theoreticly raid should be faster. :P
 
I dont have the reasources to buy hard drives to do a bench test but theoreticly raid should be faster. :P

You never said raid did you. 4 harddrives does not equal raid. It could just be four separate sized harddrives sitting there, or just plane old four harddrives.
 
You never said raid did you. 4 harddrives does not equal raid. It could just be four separate sized harddrives sitting there, or just plane old four harddrives.

No, he did say RAID in his original post.

4 160 gig hitachi sata 300 hard drive raid config

If anything I would get x2 160GB SATAII 16MB and a raptor drive for other files.
 
Average Seek Time: 8.5ms
Cache: 16MB
Features: High interface transfer rates SATA II - 3.0 Gb/s interface Rotational Vibration Safeguard Faster system boot-up 300MB/s burst data rate for faster data access Optimum performance in multi-drive systems
Form Factor: 3.5"


Average Seek Time: 8.5ms
Cache: 8MB
Features: Low power design reduces system costs and drives high reliability in ATA-RAID and other multiple drive systems Quiet operating modes ideal for use in noise-sensitive environments
Form Factor: 3.5"

These hitachi drives have the same seek time what does the cache do?

woops sorry about that double post:(
 
Ok my bad then, didn't have to time completely read through everything, sorry bout that. Cache is just a small chunk of memory built in your harddrive, generally more the better.
 
so could we make a system with the intel e6600 that will utilize duel channel and mabey SLI capable and a raid config...?:)
 
If you want SLI, I suggest you wait until the Core 2 Duo nforce 590 boards come out. They're supposed to have X16 SLI, Teaming, and a bunch of other features.
 
does the motherboard have to have raid ports or does is just use sata ports? or is there such thing as a raid port, in other words can someone find a board that has 800 MHz RAM dual channel ddr2 the e6600 cpu and capable of doing a raid with 4 hard drives. furthermore what is sataII? It would be nice if someone could configure a system with all these features, also the videocard could be added later, just the system for now or with a really cheap vid card just to get a picture.

I dont need the SLI I might get it with my next one when its cheaper...
 
does the motherboard have to have raid ports or does is just use sata ports? or is there such thing as a raid port, in other words can someone find a board that has 800 MHz RAM dual channel ddr2 the e6600 cpu and capable of doing a raid with 4 hard drives. furthermore what is sataII? It would be nice if someone could configure a system with all these features, also the videocard could be added later, just the system for now or with a really cheap vid card just to get a picture.

I dont need the SLI I might get it with my next one when its cheaper...

SATAII = 300MB/s
SATA = 150MB/s

You need to get a motherboard that supports SATA RAID. There are no "RAID ports"
 
Back
Top