how did you get a better score than me and i have a better comp?? i get 34sec for 1M and 1m35s on 2M?? or did you do it on a different comp than your sig?92gsxbaltimore said:31 secs for 1M, ran the same time on both cores as it did on just one.
and 1m13s for 2M. i guess thats pretty good huh?
well i get 30sec with SuperPi 1M. Its because the Core Duo owns allMr.Suave said:how did you get a better score than me and i have a better comp?? i get 34sec for 1M and 1m35s on 2M?? or did you do it on a different comp than your sig?
If you think thats cool, check this out:Mr.Suave said:?? i thought AMD x2 were sopose to be better?? or are these the new intel chips??
Its not inferior, the fact is that our CPU's are extremely good. I got a score of 1530 in the 3DMark06 cpu test, and according to SiSoft my cpu is a little better then the AMD X2 series.92gsxbaltimore said:Yes the comp in my signature got that score. I'm sorry that my inferior comp scored better
i wasnt saying your was inferior. now i know CPU wise yours is better. i just always thought that the AMDx2 series were better than Intels Duo series but i guess you and omega have the newer better Intel Core Duo CPU's92gsxbaltimore said:Yes the comp in my signature got that score. I'm sorry that my inferior comp scored better
what cpu do u have?Shiwen said:I got 40 seconds, guess I can be happy with that.
is that a serious statement ?why do amds do so good at this? my 3200+ kicked my celeron's butt
has anyone beat this yet?omega said:sounds good, lets see if you can beat my 30sec record
apj101 said:has anyone beat this yet?
Lets see... a 7.5Ghz P4 and a 4Ghz AMD.... against a 2.0Ghz Corefilip-matijevic said:On this forum, not yet, me, Ku-Sama and 92gsxbaltimore got 31 secs and that's the closest to [0MEGA]'s, btw, check this out:
AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 4050 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 670 Prescott @ 7500 MHz