I'd say go with 3+ HDD set up in a RAID 5. SSD technology hasn't developed enough yet and it's still too expensive. SSD are really only good for ultra light/quiet laptops at this point.
I like that ^ idea.I think that an SSD for a boot drive would be your best option for a single upgrade but do you need 128gb?
Just as another option you could have both SSD and raid.
SSD just for OS
2x WD Caviar Black in RAID 0 for everything else
Completely up to you. Just thought I'd post up another option.
Yes, I agree. But IMO, when comparing apples to apples, there's really only one way the hdd beats the ssd and that's the hdd's ability with installs/uninstalls. And there are ways to manage those.SSD is better in all ways except for capacity and cost.
What if you have large hard drives for storage and ssd for speed of frequently used programs? This is what I meant in my original post but I am not good with words!I am trying to plan which components to buy but so far I thought 128gb ssd for boot and 2 or 3tb for storage would be best. Open to other opinions, just planning it out..
I think that an SSD for a boot drive would be your best option for a single upgrade but do you need 128gb?
Just as another option you could have both SSD and raid.
SSD just for OS
2x WD Caviar Black in RAID 0 for everything else
Completely up to you. Just thought I'd post up another option.
I don't really plan on using raid, too technical for me. I thought it best to have a drive dedicated to running stuff and another dedicated to storing them. The reason I asked 'is it better to have a smaller one' is because i've read about less smaller drives failing than the larger ones. If reviews are at all correct, I can't run raid setups with caviar greens anyways. I'm hoping the speed of the ssd will get me by without needing any extra performance boosts from raid.
So I guess when the sale hits, i'll get the ssd and the hd at the same time so they can be installed together.