Which of these?

Akasa has moreCFM though, and you'll need it if your going to overclock. Not much of a difference though. 36CFM and 40CFM. If you get the Arctic make sure you dont put the speed to the lowest or your gonna overheat (lowest speedon arctic moves 5CFM -_-)
 
So you think the AKASA one is better?

I personally think the Arctic one would be better, I just want some people's opinions.
 
Well it depends on you, more CFM, overclocking, or noise? If your not worried about anything I think I'd go with the Arctic.But if you are overclocking the 4-5CFM might help a bit
 
Thinking about it, would an extra 4-5CFM help that much, I don't think it would.

I think the Arctic would better be better, the heatsink looks a lot better, also, the fan looks better on the Arctic.
 
Yes the CFM may be better but, if the heatsink is crappy then how will it help. The Arctic Cooling is a better known name, and it looks more rigid, longer lasting.
 
Thats why I said if you dont care about CFM get the Arctic. seems like arctic is the best cooler so far from the posts...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top