e837c417e5b2e17f
New Member
I install a lot of operating systems (I have eight right now XD), and Windows is the only one that does this to me.
I've got two EIDE drives and one new SATA drive. IDE Master contains zero FAT or NTFS partitions, because I use it for Linux and file storage (not that it would fare any better if I had BSD or Solaris on that drive). This pisses Windows off, and whenever I try to install it it starts complaining about how it wants to write to the MBR but it can't do it without a windows-compatible partition there. And I'm not gonna repartition that disk below the extended partition just for a whiney Windows installer. (Unhelpfully, the installer does not specify that it needs a primary partition, although I assume it does, since when I tried giving it 3 gigs of logical partition in the top end of that drive's extended partition, it didn't behave differently.)
Windows is the only OS that refuses to install without some way of writing to the MBR of a disk I'm not even installing it to. Other operating systems ask to, but you can tell them no.
What I've been doing to install Windows is unplugging my IDE cables just to install Windows, then plugging them back in and using GRUB or my BIOS drive selector to get to the Windows installs after they're done. Is there an easier way to do this? Windows is seriously the only OS I've ever had to crack my box open to install. I don't need to be trying to outsmart my OS before I even get it installed.
I think what needs to be done is to either trick Windows into thinking the SATA drive IS the master drive that it should want to write the MBR to (pereferably without messing with cables), or find a way to get it past the partitioning stage without complaining. Can Windows do this? If not, is there another way I can get Windows to install without repartitioning a drive I don't want it touching (it has already corrupted GRUB, yay for my grub-on-a-stick thumbdrive)?
I'm trying to get XP to install at the moment, but Vista had the same problem, circumvented by the above-mentioned cable unplugging.
I'm gonna clobber Windows' MBR with GRUB anyways, so it's just annoying how inflexible this installer is. Anyone with suggestions, I appreciate it.
I've got two EIDE drives and one new SATA drive. IDE Master contains zero FAT or NTFS partitions, because I use it for Linux and file storage (not that it would fare any better if I had BSD or Solaris on that drive). This pisses Windows off, and whenever I try to install it it starts complaining about how it wants to write to the MBR but it can't do it without a windows-compatible partition there. And I'm not gonna repartition that disk below the extended partition just for a whiney Windows installer. (Unhelpfully, the installer does not specify that it needs a primary partition, although I assume it does, since when I tried giving it 3 gigs of logical partition in the top end of that drive's extended partition, it didn't behave differently.)
Windows is the only OS that refuses to install without some way of writing to the MBR of a disk I'm not even installing it to. Other operating systems ask to, but you can tell them no.
What I've been doing to install Windows is unplugging my IDE cables just to install Windows, then plugging them back in and using GRUB or my BIOS drive selector to get to the Windows installs after they're done. Is there an easier way to do this? Windows is seriously the only OS I've ever had to crack my box open to install. I don't need to be trying to outsmart my OS before I even get it installed.
I think what needs to be done is to either trick Windows into thinking the SATA drive IS the master drive that it should want to write the MBR to (pereferably without messing with cables), or find a way to get it past the partitioning stage without complaining. Can Windows do this? If not, is there another way I can get Windows to install without repartitioning a drive I don't want it touching (it has already corrupted GRUB, yay for my grub-on-a-stick thumbdrive)?
I'm trying to get XP to install at the moment, but Vista had the same problem, circumvented by the above-mentioned cable unplugging.
I'm gonna clobber Windows' MBR with GRUB anyways, so it's just annoying how inflexible this installer is. Anyone with suggestions, I appreciate it.