You just repeated the point. I ran that model cpu in the last build.
What does that have to do with anything?
WinXP 64-bit vs. 32-bit
- Thread starter wixostrix
- Start date
What does that have to do with anything?
I won $17,000 at poker, smoked a fatty and hung out with my wife and watched Family Guy and Simpsons and hung out with some friends. I can assure you that there is nothing bad about it.
What does that have to do with 95 prior to OSR2 being a 16bit version of Windows?
That is the actual operating frequency for that model cpu.
The Win 9x kernel was 32-bit. Anyone saying any different needs to start smoking a different mix.
The general opinion I've gathered from the interwebs are that 64-bit versions boot faster and are just generally faster, but the extra restrictions (drivers must be signed, app compatibility etc) makes me wonder whether the performance benefit is worth it for home users.
PC eye blurbed about FAT16. Anyone who confuses a kernel with a file system shouldn't be posting on a computer forum.
The general opinion I've gathered from the interwebs are that 64-bit versions boot faster and are just generally faster, but the extra restrictions (drivers must be signed, app compatibility etc) makes me wonder whether the performance benefit is worth it for home users.
PC eye blurbed about FAT16. Anyone who confuses a kernel with a file system shouldn't be posting on a computer forum.
