Cause it caught a lot of flack early on.Why is Vista a choice?
Yes it did.Did this posible fome from my idea in the other thread about the best OS![]()
Cause it caught a lot of flack early on.
Personally, I liked it a lot. I always had it dual booted with XP, but it was always 64 bit and ran flawlessly. I think that the ones that didn't like it just didn't have a powerful enough computer to run it well.
Yes it did.
Never had ME but heard also was the worse.
I read that post as it was happening. I posted it off the top of my head.Read my previous post again, as I edited it, with much greater detail.
You liked Vista? Then why tarnish Vista and hang it as one of the choices for worst OS ever?
I had it for a while on some older dells and it always had issues with stability. I have tried it in VM and it would not install all the way. 2K did, though. It is still as stable as ever (needs to access the GPU more though.)I made a virtual machine of ME for an IT project last year. It crashed right after the install.
As many people keep saying, MAC and Mac are two different things altogether.Anyway, back on topic. Are we settled that ME was the worst (at least recent) OS? Or is there an Epic fail in MAC or linux that we are overlooking?