B bigpimp101 New Member May 4, 2006 #1 is there really a big difference b/w these two or is it not worth the 50 some odd dollars?
Geoff VIP Member May 4, 2006 #2 Most people would say no, but if you can afford it then you might as well get it. BTW, please dont double post.
Most people would say no, but if you can afford it then you might as well get it. BTW, please dont double post.
Lax VIP Member May 4, 2006 #3 YOU won't be able to notice the difference. So if you wanna save 50$ then go ahead and do it, if you wanna upgrade, do that too.
YOU won't be able to notice the difference. So if you wanna save 50$ then go ahead and do it, if you wanna upgrade, do that too.
YEA_PC_PHONICS New Member May 4, 2006 #4 Ya the only real dif is the core because thay are both 2.0 so its really just can you afford it?
AMD gs player banned May 5, 2006 #6 the 4200 has more cache and a higher fsb i think corect me if im wrong
Dr Studly banned May 5, 2006 #7 no it doesn't, the 4200+ can be clocked 200MHz higher than the 3800+ can be clocked.. thats the only difference
no it doesn't, the 4200+ can be clocked 200MHz higher than the 3800+ can be clocked.. thats the only difference
holyjunk New Member May 5, 2006 #8 isn't the 4200 better in gaming if a game only uses single core? cause i heard the 3800 stinks as far as it goes in single core gaming
isn't the 4200 better in gaming if a game only uses single core? cause i heard the 3800 stinks as far as it goes in single core gaming
AMD gs player banned May 5, 2006 #9 no i havent herd that all i have herd is that dual core prossesors run a litle slower on single core games but it is like that with all the dual core
no i havent herd that all i have herd is that dual core prossesors run a litle slower on single core games but it is like that with all the dual core