Unofficial 3DMark06 Rank Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shlouski

Shlouski

VIP Member
This thread is to be used to gather default 3dmark06 scores, as a basis for, CPU and GPU comparison. This is designed to help inform members as to the performance of different CPU and GPU combinations and speeds.

All results MUST include a screenshot of 3dmark06, with all default settings and CPU-Z or they wil not recoreded on this page.





3dmark scores:​




Intel and Nvidia:

19303 - Q9550 @ 3.9 / 275GTX
18548 - Q9550 @ 3.6 / 275GTX
18156 - Q9550 @ 3.6 / 8800GT SLI
14429 - Q6700 @ 3.0 / 9800GTX
14397 - Q6600 @ 3.0 / 8800GT
13109 - E8400 @ 3.5 / 8800GT
13091 - E3200 @ 3.4 / 8800GT
12347 - E8400 @ 3.0 / 8800GT

Intel and ATI:

21391 - Q9550 @ 4.0 / 4870 X2
20008 - E8400 @ 4.6 / 3870

AMD and Nvidia:


AMD and ATI:

10590 - X2 5000+ @ 3.3 / 3870
 
Last edited:
Well i came to the same conclusion, i knew that you would not change it, so that people can contact other people with similar systems and get advice. Ofcourse thats great, I just wanted to make a more comprehensive list of parts, so that others can see, compare and have an idea of what they can expect if they were to buy these parts. Im not trying to take anything away from your thread, instead im trying to give something back to the members that have helped me. I believe because of the competative nature of your thread that, the people who post replys are (usually) the ones who have high scores. This does not help the members that dont want to spend hundreds and hundreds and those people who may want to game very little, should still have the opportunity of getting the best parts for the money. e.g i was helping someone a couple of days ago, he was not wanting to do much gaming, so he told me he wanted a 9400gt as it was the cheapest card, not understanding for 5 dollars more he could get a 9600gt, he did not think there would be a big difference. Maybe OMEGA you can be the first to help me by posting me some scores of whatever systems you have? plz
 
This wont work because it is not accurate. it is not accurate because the score also depends on the motherboard, ram(size, speed, timings, etc) hard drive speed, if their graphics drivers are installed, OS.

EDIT: i dont think omega's thread is competitive at all. look who hold the lowest score.
 
Gooberman said:
Also doesn't show user names
Click to expand...

+1. That's probably the biggest mistake you've made. No names? What is this? You can always make something up and post it. I'll just keep looking at Omega's thread because this one is really not in order and not necessary to have.
 
ganzey said:
This wont work because it is not accurate. it is not accurate because the score also depends on the motherboard, ram(size, speed, timings, etc) hard drive speed, if their graphics drivers are installed, OS.

EDIT: i dont think omega's thread is competitive at all. look who hold the lowest score.
Click to expand...
Also if they overclocked their video card, there are just too many variables to include here.

Gooberman said:
Also doesn't show user names
Click to expand...
lubo4444 said:
+1. That's probably the biggest mistake you've made. No names? What is this? You can always make something up and post it. I'll just keep looking at Omega's thread because this one is really not in order and not necessary to have.
Click to expand...
Shlouski sent me a PM earlier telling me about this, and he feels that if you do not have user names that people would be more willing to post their scores as you aren't competing with anyone in particular. His hope was to get more people with low/mid-range setup to post scores.

As I said to him in the reply, it's my opinion that with user names, someone with a similar setup can find out who it was that received that score, and talk to him to find out how he achieved it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top