plutoniumman
New Member
@ Rollo
No company is perfect, nor have I stated that. I read the articles really fast... but is Apple switching back to NVIDIA because AMD doesn't perform as well as they expected? IMO: "working product" > "Product that works better but with defects"
...Atleast AMD appears to be trying to do something about it instead of just hiding it and hoping no one notices, like NVIDIA did.
That second article seems to have to do with manufacturing. As long as no bad products make it to consumers, why would anyone besides AMD or share holders care? Assuming I understood the article, I'd say QC at AMD did its job just fine.
No company is perfect, nor have I stated that. I read the articles really fast... but is Apple switching back to NVIDIA because AMD doesn't perform as well as they expected? IMO: "working product" > "Product that works better but with defects"
...Atleast AMD appears to be trying to do something about it instead of just hiding it and hoping no one notices, like NVIDIA did.
That second article seems to have to do with manufacturing. As long as no bad products make it to consumers, why would anyone besides AMD or share holders care? Assuming I understood the article, I'd say QC at AMD did its job just fine.