|Official|Black Hole: Benchmark Ranking thread

[Okedokey]

I gonna get the silver arrow and pown you all
It cools better then the h2o 920! see here

Id be very sceptical of 1 test on that site. Not bad though. I would like to see 4 fans on the 920 though, it would own the silver arrow. Or put the same two fans on the 920, that may be the key issue.

 

[Virssagòn]

Id be very sceptical of 1 test on that site. Not bad though. I would like to see 4 fans on the 920 though, it would own the silver arrow.

Jep, but his price is now very low. Under 60 euro! while the price from the 920 is now 99 euro.
I just didn't want to spend all that money on a watercooler, there are good aircoolers this time which beat watercoolers.

 

[Virssagòn]

I'm now making the new version. I got already a prototype.
But I need a name, because I don't like the name now.

this is a preview of the next version:

we'll wait 1-2 weeks for release.
So you can get your topscores with the current version!

smile

 

[Okedokey]

Recommendation,

too much info, just give a score, and thats it. The rest is meaningless.

 

[Virssagòn]

Recommendation,

too much info, just give a score, and thats it. The rest is meaningless.

K, I'm open for recommendations!
what info would you delete?

 

[Okedokey]

K, I'm open for recommendations!
what info would you delete?

Everything, just run it and give a score at the end.

 

[spirit]

Everything, just run it and give a score at the end.

Yeah I agree. Let it calculate the scores, but just not show them. Either hide the TextBoxes or remove the code:

TextBox2.Text="<result here>"

For example, or use:

TextBox2.Hide()

That way you can have a button which the user can press if they want to see all the scores which just uses the .Show() code.

I'll make a new background soon, probably over the weekend if I'm around.

 

[Virssagòn]

Everything, just run it and give a score at the end.

I can't let it go automatically. Thats the problem why there is a warming up.
When I let it do automatically, the threads will be running while the singlethreaded is doing his job. That will make it unstable.
So I need to make it manually...
You meant that no?

 

[Virssagòn]

Yeah I agree. Let it calculate the scores, but just not show them. Either hide the TextBoxes or remove the code:

TextBox2.Text="<result here>"

For example, or use:

TextBox2.Hide()

That way you can have a button which the user can press if they want to see all the scores which just uses the .Show() code.

I'll make a new background soon, probably over the weekend if I'm around.

aah ok, I got something in mind how to.

 

[Virssagòn]

You mean like just 1 score per test?

 

[FuryRosewood]

one score per test is good i think that would be fine

 

[Virssagòn]

one score per test is good i think that would be fine

I gonna release a snapshot today, just for tests and advice. It will be not official, so the current version stays official here for a week or 2.

 

[Okedokey]

Hey man dont just take my word for it, im just one guy...

 

[Laquer Head]

So this is what I don't get...I run it well past 5GHZ, with Ram OC'ed and the score goes down??

By laquerhead at 2012-08-05

 

[Okedokey]

So this is what I don't get...I run it well past 5GHZ, with Ram OC'ed and the score goes down??

By laquerhead at 2012-08-05

even slower then?

 

[StrangleHold]

That is odd, unless between the two runs you had more processes running in the background for some reason. Small things can make a difference, program tries to update, anti virus starts scanning blah blah blah.

 

[Laquer Head]

even slower then?

My second place score at 4.9GHZ.

That is odd, unless between the two runs you had more processes running in the background for some reason. Small things can make a difference, program tries to update, anti virus starts scanning blah blah blah.

Yah, I hear you.

I still think there is something screwy with this benchmark though..way too many inconsistencies.

 

[wolfeking]

I still think there is something screwy with this benchmark though..way too many inconsistencies.

Kind of agree. There are plenty of instances that just don't add up.

I would also love to see someone run a 2600k HT on @ 4.3 with 8GB @ 1600 9-9-9-24 just to see how the same setup would score against itself. I would be willing to bet that none of them would score the same.

 

[Okedokey]

This is actually a know issue. Many OCs in the past are slower due to the way instruction set works. Not the first time. In the past 4.8 is slower than 4.7 ghz but 4.85 is faster.

Try loosing the timing on the ram

 

[wolfeking]

Try loosing the timing on the ram

Why loose the timing? It could affect the score, and that is the stock timing of this RAM @ 1600.