Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Update your .NET Framework.

By the way I used to own an i5 760 before I got my 2500K, awesome processor! :)
 
Update your .NET Framework.

By the way I used to own an i5 760 before I got my 2500K, awesome processor! :)

Updated, still same results.

Yeah in the real world, Lynnfield processors are not much behind sandy bridge at all. They just run a lot hotter and don't overclock as well typically. They pretty much all can get to 4ghz though. But clock for clock, they are not that much slower at all. I paid $70 for this I5 760, a steal for the performance it offers. Right now running 4ghz at 1.28v, so this must be a decent clocker. I'll probably be able to get atleast 4.4-4.5ghz for this benchmark if I can get it to work.
 
What kind of temps do you have now?

The thing about 3570k VS 2500k temps is dumb. Those rumors only circulated from extreme benchers. For daily rigs, a 3570k only runs ever so slightly warmer, only a couple degrees on the same cooler/overclock/voltage.
 
What kind of temps do you have now?

The thing about 3570k VS 2500k temps is dumb. Those rumors only circulated from extreme benchers. For daily rigs, a 3570k only runs ever so slightly warmer, only a couple degrees on the same cooler/overclock/voltage.

What were your 2500K temps at 4.5Ghz with IBT? I'm running around 78/89/82/82. Of course, my processor isn't the best, but still. It does run hot even with a good cooling setup.

Updated:

SROo2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yeah in the real world, Lynnfield processors are not much behind sandy bridge at all. They just run a lot hotter and don't overclock as well typically. They pretty much all can get to 4ghz though. But clock for clock, they are not that much slower at all. I paid $70 for this I5 760, a steal for the performance it offers. Right now running 4ghz at 1.28v, so this must be a decent clocker. I'll probably be able to get atleast 4.4-4.5ghz for this benchmark if I can get it to work.
I never overclocked my 760, so I can't comment on overclocking, but at stock it was fast. I bought it at the end of the December 2010 though, about two weeks or so before Sandy Bridge replaced it. I remember being very annoyed at myself! To be honest I can't really tell the difference between the 760 and the 2500K, other than the fact the 2500K is overclocked so maybe it is faster at rendering.

They were good processors. I had an ASUS P7P55D-E board too, lovely board.
 
Nice scores over there!
Stranglehold was right, the FX scores a bit higher at the same clock speed in multithreaded.

3570k (3.4ghz) is the blue line VS 8150 (3.5ghz) the black line-

8150.jpg


VS 8320 (3.5ghz)

8320.jpg


VS 8350 (4.0ghz)

8350.jpg
 
Last edited:
What were your 2500K temps at 4.5Ghz with IBT? I'm running around 78/89/82/82. Of course, my processor isn't the best, but still. It does run hot even with a good cooling setup.

]

I don't use IBT so I don't know. But your CPU definitely runs hot to hit 80c on an H100 at 4.6ghz, that seems fairly warm too I would have expected more like 70c but then again that is IBT. Try prime95 smallFFT.
 
3570k (3.4ghz) is the blue line VS 8150 (3.5ghz) the black line-

8150.jpg


VS 8320 (3.5ghz)

8320.jpg


VS 8350 (4.0ghz)

8350.jpg

Like I already mentioned, every multithreaded benchmark is different.
I used the most recent cinebench to mention the advantage from the FX in multithreaded though.
Here are some others; the FX wins in most of them and ties others... It's just dependent on the things it stresses.
fxvsi5multi.jpg
 
Got my E5450's in. Now for some reason black hole still works fine on this PC, just not on my I5 760 rig. Weird.

3.6ghz cracked 1000 points on multithreaded.

E545036ghz.jpg



I maxxed out at 3.9ghz. Any higher voltage and the CPU would thermal throttle so the results were worse. These things throttle at 70c which sucks, I looked and looked in the bios but I don't see any option to turn it off. I think with water cooling these chips could crack 2k at around the 4.2ghz mark.

This score bested a 2600k at 4.9ghz, not bad considering I paid $84 for both of these cpu's, and have less than the cost of a 2600k invested in the board/ram/cpu's/coolers.

E5450s39ghz.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but I'm not really willing to invest more than I have into cooling already.

It's mostly ashame that it throttles at 70c. If it was 100c like normal I'd be able to get a lot higher, maybe even to 4.2ghz.
 
Yeah, but I'm not really willing to invest more than I have into cooling already.

It's mostly ashame that it throttles at 70c. If it was 100c like normal I'd be able to get a lot higher, maybe even to 4.2ghz.

hehe, what cooler do you have?
Just place your pc outside and try again xD
I bet it would cool better then, if it's -8°C outside (at night).
 
hehe, what cooler do you have?
Just place your pc outside and try again xD
I bet it would cool better then, if it's -8°C outside (at night).

Two of these-

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101288


They aren't bad, 5 heat pipe mini tower cooler. I mean to keep these quads to under 70c at 3.9ghz is fairly impressive for their size.

Yeah, well changing the voltage requires pin mods on the CPU and it's a huge PITA. I've gone through enough thermal paste removing and reinstalling them as it is. I really don't feel like doing it anymore so I'm leaving them set at 3.8ghz as a daily overclock for my server.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top