Aren't you always complaining about how slow it iswouldn't give it up for anything
Sure, although I wouldn't really state I loved a plan that offered unfulfilling performance.I am pretty sure me, and @Geoff would get Google Fiber if it came here.
$45/mo for 100/10 for meIt'd be nice if more ISPs 'played ball' and had multiple coverage in certain areas.
Google Fiber pulled out of installing in my 'hood, stuck with TWC/Spectrum for the forseeable future.
$30/mo for ~60/5 isn't too bad though.
It does indeed.Comcast's 2Gbps fiber for $150/mo sounds tempting.
Is that the fastest Comcast offers in your area?Stuck with Comcast @ a recent update to 100 MbPS down. They are the only good ISP around other than shity DSL. I've read at Broadbandreports that Comcast is a tier 1 ISP anyway. Wish we have Fios. I switch to that in no time!
My town is suppose to roll out their own ISP. I even voted for it and it passed. So that should create some nice competition and lower the price.
I get 12mbps down and 1.5 up. There's always somebody that has it way worse and way better than you. Just like everything else in life it seems.cant even imagine some of the speeds you guys get.im on shaw 150.get 175Gbs down and a whopping 15 up.oh well,as long as i never use a computer with the speeds you are posting i will never miss it.lol.mine costs me 130$ cdn including my cable package.
Why would you complain when you're getting 175Gbps down? You could host the internet for a small country with that.cant even imagine some of the speeds you guys get.im on shaw 150.get 175Gbs down and a whopping 15 up.oh well,as long as i never use a computer with the speeds you are posting i will never miss it.lol.mine costs me 130$ cdn including my cable package.
I wouldn't mind DWDMing a couple of 100G interfaces as wellWhy would you complain when you're getting 175Gbps down? You could host the internet for a small country with that.