3 years or less?
4.95738 years... (and 2 minutes, to be exact)
I don't know! Ask Intel...
your so smart and you have yours at 3.03 and what you reached that with stock voltages?Your KILLING YOURS TOO
when ever it starts to smoke...and my god man, you want an answer? here's one you can use, YES YOUR GOING TO KILL YOUR CPU! WHAT DO YOU THINK? ANY OC SHORTENS THE LIFE SPAN OF A CPU! YOU ASK IF GOING TO INSAINLY HI SPEEDS IS GOING TO KILL IT ALONG WITH A SPUPIDITY FULL OF UPING VOLTAGE! NO DUH! YES YES YES, IT WILL KILL YOUR CPU!
they dont get better performance because they have only 2mb
they dont get better performance because they have only 2mb
you HE HAS AN E6300, IT'S MORE OC'ABLE THAN THE E6600, YOU GET THE PERFORMANCE WITHOUT THE PRICE!
So the e6300 gets the same performance as the e6600
you HE HAS AN E6300, IT'S MORE OC'ABLE THAN THE E6600, YOU GET THE PERFORMANCE WITHOUT THE PRICE!
So the e6300 gets the same performance as the e6600
And rambo i did read it but anyway people with water cooling have 1.6vcore with 4ghz +
i tried everything i just probably got a bad stepping.I cant get pass 3ghz without increasing the volt really high i tried putting the vcore lower and putting my ram timings to higher and i have the ram set to 1:1.vmch i got upto 1.65 and vfsb to 1.5 but nothing cant get it stable.
i tried everything i just probably got a bad stepping.I cant get pass 3ghz without increasing the volt really high i tried putting the vcore lower and putting my ram timings to higher and i have the ram set to 1:1.vmch i got upto 1.65 and vfsb to 1.5 but nothing cant get it stable.
I think you misunderstood what Kornowski was saying. He meant that when the E6300 was overclocked the 3.0Ghz, you get (comparably) the same performance as an E6600, but for a much cheaper price.
- Rambo.