Halo 3 vs. Crysis

which do you think is better?

  • Halo 3

    Votes: 24 30.8%

  • Crysis

    Votes: 54 69.2%
  • Total voters
    78
i dont know why halo 3's getting all this media attention its CRAP never played it dont want to crysis looks well good im defently getting that
 
robina_80 said:
i dont know why halo 3's getting all this media attention its CRAP never played it dont want to crysis looks well good im defently getting that
Click to expand...

Can you play with a 7600GS? I am not saying that to be mean... I am just curious...

Nevakonaza said:
crysis is gonna be like 10% better than Halo 3:P
Click to expand...

Well, according to my exact calculations, you are wrong and it will be 10.11111111% better :rolleyes: :P

Of course it will Nevakonaza, don't have to pay to play online :P

I wonder if Mountain Dew will make 'Game Fuel' for Crysis? If not, I will order some Jolt...
 
Last edited:
Having played Halo 3, I am almost certain that Crysis will be the superior game. It won't sell as well but, then again, mainstream popularity is usually the result of ignorance (casual gamers who don't know what FPS stands for claiming that Halo 3 has teh awesomest graphix evar and camping outside the shop all night just to get it a few hours before everyone else). I would hazard a guess that most of those 'hardcore' halo fans have never heard of Crysis.
 
12-Gauge said:
Having played Halo 3, I am almost certain that Crysis will be the superior game. It won't sell as well but, then again, mainstream popularity is usually the result of ignorance
Click to expand...


lol? Crysis isnt mainstream? what did you smoke? :x

all fps games are mainstream, because all those games play (pretty much) the same way.) aim the midle of the screen towards an npc, hit the trigger. halflife is like that, halo is, farcry is, bioshock is. if you can play either of those games, you can easely play them all.
the only games that arnt mainstream would be stuff like Silent hunter games, Star Trek legacy etc. but calling a fps not mainstream is like calling santa claus slim
 
Last edited:
well,.. I'm curious what kind of advertising Crysis will get. tbh, I dont know weither of them will be ther best, i'm fairly sure both will be good games, but neither of them brings really something new to the scene.

I mean, halo 3 is a upgrade from halo 2. but then, crysis is merely a upgrade from FarCry. cant really say either of them is really original looking at it that way, no? ;)

in short, Bioshock wins, just because of the fancy underwater 50's style city ^^
 
I think Crysis will sell extremely well. I mean the PC gaming market is one of the biggest genres.. out of the 6 Billion dollar gaming industry, Pc gaming contributes about 1 Billion USD annually. And with PS2-3, Xbox and 360, gamecube and Wii, Ds and PSP, The PC gaming industry takes home more than it's fair share of the market. I know i've said PC gaming is below that of the consoles, but I was comparing the whole of consoles against one platform, the PC. Not fair on my part.

EDIT: PC gaming doesn't need TV Ads. Because the nature of computers, they need Internet ads and popularity. By all means Crysis has achieved this.
 
Last edited:
@ Archangel
I agree with you on the BioShock thing :D

Btw, I think Crysis will be over-hyped too, it is, as you said, just another FarCry. I simply believe that it will be better than Halo 3.
 
well, i can only add 1 point here. (not sure if I said it already) but i'm not going to get Crysis anyway (most likely), simply because I dont think it would run nice on my pc anyway.

just completed the Halo 3 campaign, and I must say the story is quite nice. (tough,. I dont really like the end)

and the bioshock thing was merely ment in terms of originallity. I find the AI in Bioshock to be really stupid ;)
 
Archangel said:
well, i can only add 1 point here. (not sure if I said it already) but i'm not going to get Crysis anyway (most likely), simply because I dont think it would run nice on my pc anyway.
Click to expand...

I think your just biased towards Crysis, truly! :P Because i'm in the beta, and I know it's not a finalized version, far from it, But my single 7600gt can get medium-high settings. The designers have already stated a 7950gt can play it on close to maxed settings, two 78's in SLI surpass one 7950 AFAIK. If your rig can't Play crysis, I bite my foot off. Seriously.
 
Archangel said:
I mean, halo 3 is a upgrade from halo 2. but then, crysis is merely a upgrade from FarCry. cant really say either of them is really original looking at it that way, no? ;)
Click to expand...

no, Far Cry 2 is an upgrade from Far cry. Crysis is different all together.
 
The designers have already stated a 7950gt can play it on close to maxed settings
Click to expand...

Fingers Crossed! :D

I played Halo 3 today, and to be honest, I wasn't too impressed, it was just like all the others, the same thing, some new weapons and vehicles, that's it, didn't really like it...
 
well i was rather impressed by halo 3 really enjoyed that
great fun :)
suppose that what i would be looking for tho bit less serious and a bit more fun :)
 
Ah, but you're judging on likeness of the physical setting. Crysis involves AI teamates, Alien opponents (not all), Battlesuit gameplay (switching between super speed, super strength, super armor, and Camouflage), customizable weapons, and more. It holds it's similarities, but that's unavoidable considering it's a free-choice FPS set in the jungle, and because it's made by the same people that made Farcry.
 
Also, FarCry is about an ex-marine boat skipper who is hunted by mercenaries and must battle mutant monkeys on a tropical island owned by a sadistic German scientist. Crysis, on the other hand, is about a Delta Force operative investigating an alien mothership that has been found on a tropical island currently in the control of North Korean forces.

About from the jungle bit, they are worlds apart in terms of premise and story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top