My first Pano!

[Geoff]

Tell me what you think, it was combined using three photos with the Canon stitch-assist mode, and the free program AutoStitch.

It's not the easiest to see in detail, stupid Photobucket with their auto-resize. And yes the camera was set to vivid mode, which probably isn't the best considering the concentration of green in the area.

 

[computeruler]

if i didnt know any better i would think it was some sort of super wide lens thingy good job

 

[Geoff]

Thanks

 

[quagmondo23]

Looks very nice.... very green

 

[salman]

Wow thats awesome man, looks proper good.
You could probably capture loads of nice stuff with auto stitch panomatic.

 

[Sir Travis D]

You should try photobucket for no resizing pics. Nice picture though!

 

[epidemik]

Wow, good job. Cant see the stitching at all
How many pictues is it?

 

[computeruler]

thats what hes using photobucket

 

[Geoff]

Thanks for all the complements guys!

Wow, good job. Cant see the stitching at all
How many pictues is it?

It's 3 photos. I may upgrade to Photobucket Pro for $25/year, which increases the resolution to 2560 x something.

And to those who say 4GB of RAM isn't used, just take a look at what a few photos takes up in AutoStitch:

 

[DCIScouts]

It looks great, I'm really excited that this feature is becoming more common among the $200 range cameras rather than just limited to the $400+ range cameras...

 

[Geoff]

It looks great, I'm really excited that this feature is becoming more common among the $200 range cameras rather than just limited to the $400+ range cameras...

Yeah, this was taken on my S3-IS. You really don't need a camera that supports it though, just use your best guess as to where the next photo should be taking, and let the software do the rest.

 

[shenry]

And to those who say 4GB of RAM isn't used, just take a look at what a few photos takes up in AutoStitch:

Exactly you have 1 Gig left!

Nice Job Omega

 

[Punk]

I'm going to try this

 

[jimmymac]

if you dont want to lose quality in your pics then upload to https://www.photoshop.com/express/landing.html

i use that for my albums now and they dont resize

 

[TFT]

Thats good, the few times I have attempted a panoramic shot in the past I never positioned myself correctly and the exposure was different in all three shots. Could have sorted it later I suppose but didn't have an editor at the time.
It's a good feeling when it all turns out good.

 

[funkysnair]

Thanks for all the complements guys!


It's 3 photos. I may upgrade to Photobucket Pro for $25/year, which increases the resolution to 2560 x something.

And to those who say 4GB of RAM isn't used, just take a look at what a few photos takes up in AutoStitch:

holly crap lol----ive got 4gigs but ive not used it all up to now

 

[Geoff]

if you dont want to lose quality in your pics then upload to https://www.photoshop.com/express/landing.html

i use that for my albums now and they dont resize

I have an account there, but last I looked you couldn't make folders inside of folders, which is what I like about Photobucket. I'm just going to pay $25 per year for their pro version, which has fewer limitations.

holly crap lol----ive got 4gigs but ive not used it all up to now

hehe, imagine what it would be like with 10 photos

 

[Punk]

I had a go too:

Originals:

Panorama:

It's not very good, it's the view from my window. My software isn't great, I used Hugin... Does anyone know of a good software that will keep the quality of the picture?

 

[Punk]

Second try with AutoStitch then edited in Fireworks 8:

 

[Geoff]

Second try with AutoStitch then edited in Fireworks 8:

Very nice. AutoStitch was the program that I used, did you tweak the settings though? Some of the ones I would change is adjusting the JPEG quality from a default of 75% to 100%, and increase the size of the panorama.