I don't see 800MHz FSB anywhere therehttp://www.ats-systems.com/ said:this processor runs at 3.40 GHz with an advanced 800 MHz system bus
heeheeheePraetor said:Bobo: have a read at this before you look at advertisements (yes advertisements ... note how often Intel refers to its 800MHz FSB products....ya... that's right.... darn near zero)
http://www.computerforum.com/showpost.php?p=52447&postcount=29
![]()
Well FSB would be wrongAnd I KNOW THAT AMD USES HTT!!!! I was just using fsb because I felt like it
Praetor said:Well FSB would be wrong. And its 1GHz clock, not 2GHz.
![]()
It doesnt have to say that on the advertisement. And neither will it because advertisements are made by morons. 2GHz is because of DDR. The clock is 1GHz.I still don't see where it says that......
Praetor said:Current processors: AMD
Significantly-older-processors: Intel
WTF? How about the A64-4000? Naturally that logic fails as Intel doesnt have 4.0GHz chip.
When you find me a chip that "acts" like its running at a different clock speed than it is .. lemme know.Praetor, they will act as if it was 4GHZ. Intel will come out with new CPUs shortly.
.... and this is me being convinced ....I have 1.35GHZ, but actually it appears to be 2.7GHZ to 3.0GHZ. But hey, as long as it does the job, I'm happy
1. Yes and how come AMD doesnt know about this?New technology, avoid thinking that everything is EXACT
Benchmark the AMD DDR-CPU? LOLhey, pc technology could you benchmark your cpu, I wanna see how slow it really is