Vista has some things in it that just do not make any sense to me at all. Like for example SMB2 (server message block) which is what windows uses to file and print share. Now, in SMB, the version that XP uses runs a lot more effecient over the network. For example, in NT/2k/XP and Linux/unix/os x paltforms running SMB or SAMBA, when a user deleted a file it would send one packet to the resource and one packet back for verification. Now in SMB2, the new updated file/print sharing protocol in vista runs a bit different. From the command line, if you delete a file over the network it sends 8 packets to the resource and then 8 back. Not a huge increase, however its like 800% more bandwidth used.
Guess how many packets is sent when you delete a file from the GUI? 10, 30, 50, 150? Guess...answer is in white below this
1500, yup thats right 1500 packets
How many did you guess? LOL that is HUGE increase of network traffic.
Sources:
http://www.twit.tv/floww14
http://www.digg.com/podcasts/FLOSS_Weekly/20337
http://tamgo.wordpress.com/tag/microsoft/(scroll down to the vista review)
Seems that this probably won't happen when a visa box goes to another vista box, and previous versions of windows will use SMB1. So, what does that mean when like 75% of the servers that run the internet/business run Linux or Unix and have to talk to vista boxes? Will the 1500 packets cause bandwidth to be slaughtered? Or is it a ploy to get everyone running MS servers/enterprise solutions?
sorry I went off on a rant...