Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

[Virssagòn]

Meh I don't care too much. I have a small micro ATX case and won't even fit 120mm coolers. I thought about going back to full ATX but honestly I run 4.5ghz daily which is overkill for my needs and this little cooler never gets over 65c while gaming.

k, no problem, just a recommendation

 

[salvage-this]

 

[87dtna]

thats mean

 

[Virssagòn]

thats mean

Yep, like I said. This version is more stable then the previous one. The same cpu's will get very close scores on the same clock.

 

[spirit]

New Features:

- Free ram use, not limited anymore (it uses not more then 2.6gb though...)
- Stable scores @multithreaded and singlethreaded.
- Working with multipliers.
- Detecting logical cores of your cpu and use this in the benchmark.
- affinity added, 4cores will not try to run more then they can.
- Added more threads; 4threads working on the singlethreaded bench, 16 on the multithreaded.
- Testing core stability by an higher thread rate.
- Base application had a clean from all known bugs for now.
- Score scale is went 2/10 bigger...
- multithreaded and singlethreaded more equal to get the most accurate scores in performance.


- This version is the base/start from many updates, updates will not affect the scores.

You forgot to mention the awesome addition of the new background image which I took the other night.

I have already tested the betas for this on my 2500K @ 4.3GHz and I scored 1,348 I think. Will test again tomorrow. I'll also test it out on the Q8300 and the 3700+ and come last again!

 

[salvage-this]

thats mean

I still wish I could use use your settings. I can't seem to OC mine as well as yours can

 

[Virssagòn]

You forgot to mention the awesome addition of the new background image which I took the other night.

I have already tested the betas for this on my 2500K @ 4.3GHz and I scored 1,348 I think. Will test again tomorrow. I'll also test it out on the Q8300 and the 3700+ and come last again!

Haha, nice!
Thnx btw, will add that directly! ;p
(Eum, didn't I mentioned somewhere?)

 

[claptonman]

Nice program. All cores were 100% on the first test and only one core had 100% on the single-threaded.

 

[Virssagòn]

Nice program. All cores were 100% on the first test and only one core had 100% on the single-threaded.

Thanks.
Your scores seem to be more believable then with the previous version. Pretty nice scores!

 

[FuryRosewood]

Ran it just a few minutes ago

 

[spirit]

This older quad-core stacks up well to the newer processors I think. Especially the FX-6100, which it is only 100 or so points behind.

 

[Virssagòn]

This older quad-core stacks up well to the newer processors I think. Especially the FX-6100, which it is only 100 or so points behind.

pfff, I just updated the scores... And what do I see! fk, again update lol.

 

[Virssagòn]

Voila, Update:

 

[spirit]

To be honest I have my doubts that an FX-6100 is much better than this C2Q. I wouldn't bother updating the whole program just to make the Q8300 come out a lot worse. The Q8300 is a stronger processor than most people think.

It's a 'Core 2 Quad' btw.

 

[Virssagòn]

To be honest I have my doubts that an FX-6100 is much better than this C2Q. I wouldn't bother updating the whole program just to make the Q8300 come out a lot worse. The Q8300 is a stronger processor than most people think.

It's a 'Core 2 Quad' btw.

Fu you, not gonna update until there is another test

 

[spirit]

Fu you, not gonna update until there is another test

Got the Athlon all fried up and I'm going to run the bench on it.

 

[spirit]

 

[Virssagòn]

An update...
congrtz spirit

 

[spirit]

Haha thanks on the congrats for being the slowest. Had to run it with the side panel off to ensure my system didn't fry!

 

[Virssagòn]

Haha thanks on the congrats for being the slowest. Had to run it with the side panel off to ensure my system didn't fry!

Haha, Got my cpu now on 4.8ghz. Weird, normally it shuts down after a blue screen, this time is different. I'll test it directly!