Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

Status
Not open for further replies.
a dual cpu setup! Nice!
You can see it see it from the difference between singlethreaded and multithreaded!
You gonna try to oc higher? I read that Xeons are pretty good in that since they use less voltage and produce less heat. 1 disadvantage there is that they have a limit.
F.e; the q6600 (which is ~equal to the X3220) can overclock higher then the X3220, but the X3220 will use less voltage and produce less heat at the same clock speed.

I wonder if you could hit 1000 in multithreaded. Probably you could since you're able to get at least 3.6ghz.
 
Well I'll probably be upgrading the CPU's to E5440's most likely for the higher multiplier and it's only about $50 for 2 of them. They are 2.83 stock VS the E5410 is 2.33 stock.

With the BSEL mod for 1600 FSB I'll be at 3.4ghz with those chips. If I score 744 with only 2.6ghz I think 3.4 will crack 1000.
 
Well I'll probably be upgrading the CPU's to E5440's most likely for the higher multiplier and it's only about $50 for 2 of them. They are 2.83 stock VS the E5410 is 2.33 stock.

With the BSEL mod for 1600 FSB I'll be at 3.4ghz with those chips. If I score 744 with only 2.6ghz I think 3.4 will crack 1000.

Aah, now I get it. You're not overclocking in BIOS? Your mobo doesn't allow it.
Nice the BSEL mod, should it work on my i7 920?
It just let the system think the cpu runs on higher FSB, without changing in bios or programs like setFSB, like the cpu runs in stock on a higher clockspeed!
 
Yeah it's a server board, no overclocking or overvolting. I7 920 doesn't have FSB.

The BSEL mod requires you to actually jump pins in the socket, I doubt you want to do that with a 1366 socket as the pins are far smaller and closer together.
 
3ghz, was slightly disappointed with the results but hey still a good score for 5 year old CPU's.....tying a stock 3770k!

E5410s3ghz.jpg
 
Again, 5 year old CPU's lol and only 3ghz. I also have less than a 3770k invested in this entire tower, including the gtx 560 Ti I'm currently running on it!


With this FSB speed on E5440's I will be at 3.6ghz
 
Last edited:
AMD Vishera 8350 @ stock I don't know if this matters but I guess I should say I have default turbo boost on

I wish I knew to go intel! lol

ftzy4k.png
 
Last edited:
Did you close everything while testing? Backgroundprocesses like steam, origin,..
I really thought the FX should score higher on the multithreaded part.
 
me too... I had stuff running originally, and... I did the test, and then I closed everything redid the test I got the same score o_O
I can try running it again if you want with amd overdrive forcing the frequency of all 8 cores to max
 
Last edited:
Looks about right to me. A 3570k at 4.4ghz should easily beat an 8350 at 4.1ghz, even multithreaded.

This is what baffles me about people recommending an 8350 over a 3570k. It's takes an 8350 5ghz to match a 3570k at 4.4ghz for multithreaded apps, and in single threaded it would take an 8350 atleast 6ghz to match the 3570k which obviously isn't going to happen and even 5ghz isn't gauranteed while 4.4ghz is a piece of cake on ANY 3570k, most will do 4.5-4.6ghz daily and most 8350's do ~4.8ghz daily so the 3570k still easily beats it at literally everything.

 
Last edited:
This is what baffles me about people recommending an 8350 over a 3570k. It's takes an 8350 5ghz to match a 3570k at 4.4ghz for multithreaded apps,

How do you figure that. This is a 8120 at 4.5. Just 100 mhz faster then that 3570 and beats its with a 688 in multi.


89210516.jpg
 
strangle you should overclock mine :D

Was getting a 8320 for a good deal a few weeks ago, but it fell through. Thought about ordering a few of them. But I still have a few 8120s and 6200s, I need to burn them through before I order any more. Keeping this 8120 I have now though, clocks pretty well with low voltage. Will do 4.5 with only 1.392V. Have had it up to 4.8 with a 1.475V.

44090634.jpg
 
me too... I had stuff running originally, and... I did the test, and then I closed everything redid the test I got the same score o_O
I can try running it again if you want with amd overdrive forcing the frequency of all 8 cores to max

yeh, do it again. You should have at least 600 on multi. The singlethreaded will not change though...
 
How do you figure that. This is a 8120 at 4.5. Just 100 mhz faster then that 3570 and beats its with a 688 in multi.
]


I guess this bench isn't very realistic then. It takes about 3.8ghz on an 8320 to match a 3570k at stock 3.4ghz in cinebench multithreaded test. The 8350 at stock 4.0ghz just barely beats a 3570k. Of of course single threaded they both get obliterated.
 
I guess this bench isn't very realistic then. It takes about 3.8ghz on an 8320 to match a 3570k at stock 3.4ghz in cinebench multithreaded test. The 8350 at stock 4.0ghz just barely beats a 3570k. Of of course single threaded they both get obliterated.

Yeah, that's why I ask Kirtus to test again. I'm working on the program, got already some new calcs to use and get better scaling. But I think he had some programs opened at the same time, that's why he's getting that bad results.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top