Black Hole - Benchmark (OLD Version)

Status
Not open for further replies.
87dtna said:
4.4ghz....doesn't make much sense, the single threaded is higher than the 3930k at 4.2ghz but the multithreaded is much lower.
Click to expand...

It is the first gen i7 series CPU that made better single thread. Most of program/game does not use single thread anymore.
 
Dude you need to not talk anymore.

The 3930k is sandy bridge, 2nd gen I7 which SHOULD be MUCH faster at single threaded then first gen I7.

Anyway, no thermal throttling at 4.4ghz, not even close actually only hit about 85c.
 
87dtna said:
Dude you need to not talk anymore.

The 3930k is sandy bridge, 2nd gen I7 which SHOULD be MUCH faster at single threaded then first gen I7.

Anyway, no thermal throttling at 4.4ghz, not even close actually only hit about 85c.
Click to expand...

Let's wait until what other would say. Like i had LGA 1156. Multithread thread is lower than single thread.

BTW I can talk as i want. There is no way can block from someone else to say wrong thing or anything bad. Also, it is really old argument when someone is trying to stop me from talk.
 
Last edited:
I noticed I haven't posted a public result since way back when. This is with the rig in sig.

clipboard01la.jpg
 
Jamebonds1 said:
Let's wait until what other would say. Like i had LGA 1156. Multithread thread is lower than single thread.
Click to expand...

I see now you are talking about this specific benchmark comparing multithreaded to single threaded. You didn't follow what I was saying then, and you obviously didn't look at my bench results to even say that because my multithreaded is way higher than singlethreaded.

I was comparing the 980x to the 3930k, not just single and multithreaded for the 980x. The single threaded on my 980x was higher than the single threaded for the 3930k, which makes no sense as sandy bridge has much higher single threaded performance than nehalem/westmere in real life apps.
 
Last edited:
Anyway, just squeaked out another couple mhz to secure second place, as before I was only tying it which would make me third. Core 2 runs hot under load, but cool at idle. Weird. Temps topped out at TJmax on that core so it was right on the verge of thermal throttling.

980x446ghz.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice scores.
But your 980x is scoring just the same as all sandy and ivy bridges if clocked equal.
The only reason why the i7 3930 is scoring better in other singlethreaded benches is because they test it with the baseclock which is higher for the i7 3930k.
 
KasperL's 3930k scored 1176 points in multithreaded alone at only 4.2ghz. I didn't even crack 1000 points at 4.46ghz.
 
87dtna said:
KasperL's 3930k scored 1176 points in multithreaded alone at only 4.2ghz. I didn't even crack 1000 points at 4.46ghz.
Click to expand...

I was talking about singlethreaded :P.
Multithreaded is a nice improvement for intel.
They didn't need to improve their singlethreaded much, because they were and still are much ahead of AMD.
 
Update of scores:

Still no one who hits the 2xxx range?! Who will be the first? :D

The i7 2600K and the i7 3820 are very competing cpu's if you see their scores always be equal at almost the same clock!
scoresv32.jpg
 
voyagerfan99 said:
I use Adblock Plus, so I don't see any ads anywhere on the internet :D
Click to expand...

I'm using AdBlock too and still ImageShack is covered in ads, it's the only site which I know of that still is.

As for "who will hit 2,000 first?", anybody with a 3930K or 3960X @ ~4.4GHz+ I reckon should be able to do it. Just ask Kasper to overclock his 3930K to 4.4GHz and see what it does.
 
spirit said:
I'm using AdBlock too and still ImageShack is covered in ads, it's the only site which I know of that still is.

As for "who will hit 2,000 first?", anybody with a 3930K or 3960X @ ~4.4GHz+ I reckon should be able to do it. Just ask Kasper to overclock his 3930K to 4.4GHz and see what it does.
Click to expand...

I'll ask him to oc a little more then 4.4ghz ;P maybe 2100 points? XD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top