Black Hole V2

[Virssagòn]

Black Hole V2


By SmileMan & Spirit

Hey guys,
here is the next version of Black hole!
It will be stable for both companies: Intel and AMD.

It's a multithreaded and singlethreaded benchmark, so we can see how good your cpu is per core and how well when it uses all of it's cores!

Some Information:

Multithreaded
- 3 passes and one warming up round
- 1st pass: calculating with floating point maths, this is 8threaded
- 2nd pass: integer maths, 8threaded
- 3rd pass: Xtreme pass, 32threaded (integer maths)

Singlethreaded
- 2 passes
- 1st pass: integer maths
- 2nd pass: floating point maths

64x BIT ONLY!

The tests will last at least 3 minutes to run the 2.
It can be unresponsible for a while, just let it do his thing then.
All other programs must be closed for best results.
The results you can post here.
I'll post the scores in one ranking table.
You must run the 2 tests for getting the final score!

The higher the scores, the better!

Installing the benchmark:

Not really difficult:
just download the zip file from here
extract the exe
And run the 2 tests

Preview:

Scores:

AWARDS OF BLACK HOLE V2! (sorry that you had to wait)

Here is an overview of all the tests from Black Hole v2:

The top 10 and their grandpa:

Winners of the top 10 award:

1. KasperL - 3930K @ 4.3
2. Yachu - 2600K @ 4.5
3. Jiniix - 2600K @ 4.8
4. LaquerHead - 3700K @ 4.9
5. SmileMan - 2600K @ 4.7
6. Wolfeking - 2600K @ 4.7
7. Tech Savvy - 2550K @ 4.5
8. Jiniix - 2500K @ 4.8
9. salvage-this - 3570K @ 4.7
10. SmileMan - 3700 @ stock

congratz!!

The 3rd place go to!

Jiniix - i7 2600K @ 4.8 - 1,210 pts

On the second place!

Yachu - i7 2600K @ 4.5 - 1,254 pts

And the winner is!!!

KasperL - i7 3930K @ 4.3, 1,323 pts

At our last place!

Spirit - Athlon 64 3700+

The best Intel in this bench!

KasperL - 3930K @ 4.2

The AMD winner is!

StrangleHold - FX-8150 @ 4.5

Then we have our guy with his high oc!

LaquerHead - 3770K @ 4.9

And the tester with most balls is!

Jiniix

Thank you all for testing and congrtz with your awards!!!!


Smile & Spirit

 

[Virssagòn]

Here are my scores!

 

[KasperL]

Oh. When i get home i'll test it, and get that first place again :-D

 

[Virssagòn]

My other pc
there is much difference because this benchmark is much more sensitive then the previous!

 

[Virssagòn]

Oh. When i get home i'll test it, and get that first place again :-D

who knows
maybe the six core got beaten in the singlethreaded

You saw the awards? You have some of them!

 

[Virssagòn]

an other score from a stock i7 3770.

http://www.computerforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=5250&stc=1&d=1345462432

 

[wolfeking]

I will do a run at 4.7 or 4.7 when I get home. I like these scores though. They make sense. Much more believable too.

 

[Virssagòn]

I will do a run at 4.7 or 4.7 when I get home. I like these scores though. They make sense. Much more believable too.

yeah, the previous scores are less sensitive. So we can see the difference much better!

 

[wolfeking]

Thanks for that, because the last ones did not make much sense. It is still helping to have more ram even though it never used 2GB before?

 

[Virssagòn]

Thanks for that, because the last ones did not make much sense. It is still helping to have more ram even though it never used 2GB before?

I think the speed helps in multithreaded like before.
You can test it

 

[wolfeking]

Well I want to know basically what is going on. Because it may be a okay benchmark written in a language that is not ment for benchmarks, but it makes no sense that 16GB is better than 8GB when 8GB is not being maxxed.

 

[Virssagòn]

Well I want to know basically what is going on. Because it may be a okay benchmark written in a language that is not ment for benchmarks, but it makes no sense that 16GB is better than 8GB when 8GB is not being maxxed.

Yeh, I know. But the speed made sense too I think.

BTW: you got the award from best tester in previous version! (with bigfella and spirit, for some reason you all tested very much )

 

[wolfeking]

so. I am not doing it for a award. Its pointless to have awards.

and we were running different speeds. you were on 1600 yes? and i was on 1866, but you score better at same clocks. So it makes no sense that it was speed as I should have owned you at that speed.

 

[Virssagòn]

so. I am not doing it for a award. Its pointless to have awards.

and we were running different speeds. you were on 1600 yes? and i was on 1866, but you score better at same clocks. So it makes no sense that it was speed as I should have owned you at that speed.

Yeah, my oc was with the buspeed at 103. So my clockspeed was something like 4.735 or something and my ram speed was also a bit improved.
But it can be that the ram increases it with his quantity, I can't explain why. I already searched for answers...

 

[wolfeking]

103 busspeed should have been 1620 ram clocks. And that suggestion is false in every way. RAM will be the same speed no matter how much RAM you have. a 1600 MHz 4GB dimm is always slower than a 2133 1GB dimm.

 

[Virssagòn]

Current scores:

 

[wolfeking]

yay. I will break 1200! lol. I hope at 4.5 or 4.7 or 4.9 I will. I will try for stable with AC blowing right into it to see. only 4 more hours!

 

[Virssagòn]

yay. I will break 1200! lol. I hope at 4.5 or 4.7 or 4.9 I will. I will try for stable with AC blowing right into it to see. only 4 more hours!

we'll see!

 

[salvage-this]

 

[Darren]