bottle neck system?

CmoAMD

New Member
I plan on ordering in a month, all ok? Anything out of date? I havent been on forum in a while and I dont know if theres any new stuff out. Thanks.

(This is my gaming/editing/software computer.)

OPERATING SYSTEM:
Windows x64

CPU/PROCESSOR:
AMD FX 60

MOTHERBOARD:
DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 SLI-DR Expert

CASE:
Thermaltake XASER Armor Series VA8000BWS Black

MEMORY:
2 x 1GB OCZ Titanium

HARD DRIVE:
2 x Western Digital Raptor 74GB 10,000 RPM Serial ATA150 Hard Drive (RAID0)

POWER SUPPLY:
OCZ PowerStream OCZ520ADJSLI ATX, BTX, SATA, P4 and EPS12V 520W

VIDEO CARD:
eVGA 512-P2-N575-AX Geforce 7900GTX 512MB

SOUND CARD:
Creative Labs X-Fi XtremeMusic

CD / DVD DRIVES:
LITE-ON 16X DVD±R DVD Burner W/ LightScribe and 5X DVD-RAM Write Black ATAPI/E-IDE

KEYBOARD:
Logitech G15

MOUSE:
Logitech G5 Laser Mouse
 
Last edited:
I saw that new card, havent really read about it, but its cheaper = worse?

Also, I made a mistake on my copy and paste, its a FX 60 im getting
 
tweaker said:
Invest in the 7900GT instead.
I agree. The 7900GT is slightly better than the 7800GTX, and alot cheaper.

CmoAMD said:
How can the 7900gtx be cheaper but better? I also see some are 512, should I get that one?
If you want a better card, then get the 7900GTX.

Get rid of the Raptor drive, they arent worth the extra price
Agreed, i would buy a SATAII 16MB Cache drive instead.
 
If you really want RAID then get 2x 250GB SATAII 16MB Cache. But if you really think the Raptor is worth it then get one raptor and one sata.
 
I saw that new card, havent really read about it, but its cheaper = worse

People were complaining the they couldn't play Oblivion max settings, it lagged the 7900gt card...

Well, I can.. See specs. (In sig)
 
CmoAMD said:
I saw that new card, havent really read about it, but its cheaper = worse?

Its better.

Antiodontalgic said:
People were complaining the they couldn't play Oblivion max settings, it lagged the 7900gt card...

Well, I can.. See specs. (In sig)

Sure, but at what res.
 
Last edited:
So the 78900GTX is better and cheaper than the 7800GTX, and I can get the 7900GTX 512MB for nearly the same price as the 7800GTX 256MB. Why would anyone buy the 7800's?

As for the Hard Drives, im still not sure on what to get... im kinda slow headed when it comes to 2 HD's. I've always had 1 drive, the C drive, so when it comes to having more than 1 I dont get it. Do I always have to save stuff under the D: drive? or how does it work?
 
CmoAMD said:
So the 78900GTX is better and cheaper than the 7800GTX, and I can get the 7900GTX 512MB for nearly the same price as the 7800GTX 256MB. Why would anyone buy the 7800's?

As for the Hard Drives, im still not sure on what to get... im kinda slow headed when it comes to 2 HD's. I've always had 1 drive, the C drive, so when it comes to having more than 1 I dont get it. Do I always have to save stuff under the D: drive? or how does it work?

It's called partitioning, what it does is it divides your HDD into "parts". The C: partition is usually used for Windows, but the advantage with partitioning a HDD is that if something goes wrong and you have to reformat the C: partition and re-install Windows you won't lose all your files cause you will have atleast a part of those files on another partition. You only need 1 HDD to partition, but they were suggesting a RAID setup, which involves, from what I've read, two HDD's having parts of files on both HDD's and working as 1 big HDD.
 
Last edited:
Ok I switched it out for a 7900GTX 512MB, the best one. With SLI, it is possible to go back and add a second card from just having 1 right? Also, is my PSU fine for OCing?
 
ceewi1 said:
Yes and yes

Sweet!

Ok, does anyone mind giving me the breakdown on more than 1 HD? I know that you can have 1 large HD and partion it, but I believe it still uses the same RPM's.

When you 2 or more HD's in RAID, does the computer only have a C: Drive? or 2? I think the reason for this is that they dont have to share the RPM's, so its faster.
 
It shows as only one drive, and gives slightly improved performance in some cases. Take a look at RAID 101 for more info (what you're talking about is RAID0).
 
Back
Top