bomberboysk
Active Member
For CODMW2 Id say at least a 9600gt or 4670, but preferably a GTS250/9800gtx(same core) or a HD4850 or above to play good settings/res/framerates.I doubt CODMW2 will really use all that much graphicswise.
For CODMW2 Id say at least a 9600gt or 4670, but preferably a GTS250/9800gtx(same core) or a HD4850 or above to play good settings/res/framerates.I doubt CODMW2 will really use all that much graphicswise.
Some places you can cut cost:This is the best I could come up with
PSU
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817341012
CPU
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103648
RAM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134488
Mobo
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128342
GPU
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102820
it's a little over budget but I didn't won't to skip on quality every thing is good quality and will last a long. I'm sure he can get a little extra money together.
Some places you can cut cost:
Athlon II X2 240:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103688
PSU, Xclio stablepower 500W is actually a bit better than the OCZ StealthXStream and $10 less:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817189014
The athlon II X2 has 2mb of faster L2 Cache,and no L3 cache.+1 on the PSU but I'm going to have to disagree on the CPU maybe this instead http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103694 that would put it just below $300.
The athlon II X2 has 2mb of faster L2 Cache,and no L3 cache.
The Phenom II X2 has 1MB of L2 cache, and 6mb of the slower L3 cache
They both would overclock similarly, and in gaming would perform roughly the same.(The Athlon II X2 and Phenom II X2 are both the same architecture)
A Phenom II X2 is a waste of money, if your going dual go with an Athlon II X2 240 and overclock it, or get a Phenom II X3 710 or 720, the 710's will hit at least 3.2 just on the stock heatsink, and around 3.6 on an aftermarket from what ive seen. Also, games will start using more multiple threads vs higher clocked dual cores, and even then you can overclock the tri cores to the same speeds you can overclock a phenom II X2 to. It depends how much you want to spend, but go with one of these cpus:Brought up the idea of going with onboard until later, he seemed okay with it, but then again he thought about just waiting and saving up cash. After all the game doesn't come out until November.
My friend liked these two processors,
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103649
AMD Phenom II X3 720 2.8GHz 3 x 512KB L2 Cache 6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 95W Triple-Core Black Processor
and
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103680
AMD Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition Callisto 3.1GHz 2 x 512KB L2 Cache 6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 80W Dual-Core Processor
He wanted to know which would be the better choice.
I told him what I knew, or thought I knew. That the dual core is not that much cheaper than the triple core but the only time the performance difference would be real noticeable is when running more than one intensive program. I.E. Call of Duty and running disk defragmenter in the background.
And this motherboard.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128397
GIGABYTE GA-MA785GMT-UD2H AM3 AMD 785G HDMI Micro ATX AMD Motherboard
Just giving out what he found/wanted and what all you gurus thought. If any of those parts are not recommended, it would sure be nice to know instead of blindly continuing forward.
Any information you have will be shared with him. (He doesn't have a computer yet, therefore no internet, and therefore he cannot ask you all these questions himself.)
Thanks again in advance for any replies,
Maverick720