Hmmm, I always thought the C2D is a much better solution for laptop performance/portability wise.. guess I was wrong..
is AMD Athlon X2 M300 the same as AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 QL-65 ??
tnx buddy
I found this one -
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicat...ffiliateID=Es5Ekr9eEBk-c02STrvgCdQm8RH_PTv8Eg
edit: how come the T6600 performs better than its postdecessers ??
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 @ 2.20GHz 1570 223
Intel Core2 Duo T6670 @ 2.20GHz 1430 251
Intel Core2 Duo T7100 @ 1.80GHz 968 388
Intel Core2 Duo T7200 @ 2.00GHz 1131 327
Intel Core2 Duo T7250 @ 2.00GHz 1103 341
Intel Core2 Duo T7300 @ 2.00GHz 1123 332
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 @ 2.16GHz 1231 301
Intel Core2 Duo T7500 @ 2.20GHz 1254 294
Intel Core2 Duo T7600 @ 2.33GHz 1308 279
Intel Core2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz 1382 263
Intel Core2 Duo T7800 @ 2.60GHz 1494 237
Intel Core2 Duo T8100 @ 2.10GHz 1341 269
Intel Core2 Duo T8300 @ 2.40GHz 1499 235
edit2:
hmmm, after a bit of a research.. the details seem pretty wierd for me..
AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M300 1210 309
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 @ 2.20GHz 1570 223
AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-65 1082 349
Pentium Dual-Core T4400 @ 2.20GHz 1431 250
I always thought the C2D T6600 is FAR better than the T4400, and the performance difference between them seem pretty unnoticable according to this chart.. is that reliable ?