It is far from professional looking though.
well windows 95 is old. I use 2000 regularly, and XP, and I think both of them are ok looking from a professional sense. Ubuntu used to be that way, back in 10.04 and back. Seems Unity is just too complicated. I would like less bells and eye candy and a little more usefulness.
got it downloading now. I will give it a try and offer any insight that I can. I think it is just going to be more of the same 11 crap they have been peddling.
__________________
to be honest, I would take 2000 over XP any day, unless you need Chrome or Flashplayer on it. That is where 2000 lets you down.
you will see what I have to say maybe. So far I have downloaded it twice, and burned 4 times, and all 4 times it has failed the verification. I am going to try on a computer at school monday to see if they will have any better luck.
whats wrong with OO? I use it daily and see no problem with it other than it is not M$ office.
Open source. that is where ubuntu is failing as a Linux OS. They are moving to a closed source model, in favor of market share. This is forsaking Linux.To those who say 'Ubuntu has sold out!'
My response to this again is 'really???' Yes Linux is all about open source and being free
Cost is not a motivator to me, I would pay to have it if need be.
maybe if it did, but only in russian or maybe Latina format. hmm... Italian language pack anyone?I will not pay $200 for an Office suite, even if it came with a nubile young secretary with no morals.