Need your opinion...

djcon

New Member
My HD is a Seagate (ST3200822AS) 200 GB SATA Hard Drive... It seems to be a peice of crap... am I right? should I buy a new HD? my RAM Just died today... and Im thinking i might buy a bunch of new stuff for my computer, but, should I buy a new HD?

thanks.
 
In what way? would be the obvious question to ask here. If the drive itself is none functional then replacement would be the thing needed. If you are simply having software problems that would be seen on "any" drive you install.
 
well the Drive works... but I heard Seagate was a bad brand... so i was wondering if i should replace it or not?
 
erm, if it doesn't have the clicks of death or run into problems then its fine.

BTW, Seagate is one of the BEST brands in the world. The majority of the people use Seagate Hard Drives. Some do use WD (which is now owned by seagate).

Whoever told you seagate sucks, tell him he's an idiot:D
 
WD is owned by Seagate? Seagate recently merged with Maxtor, I think that is who you are thinking of.

You are right though, Seagate is not a bad brand. People have had problems with them, but that can be said of any company, especially in the computer electronics area.
 
Western Digital has had the best rep for the longest time. But even with the best you can run smack into a defective drive at times. Seagate always had the edge over Maxtor! Those were the opidemy for the longest time. blah! Go by what you will find in the systems by SUN Microsystems for a good look at the best drives used for the most part.
 
When you get a good drive and perform the simple periodic maintainence it can last for a good number of years. While some old WDs are still sitting around in the basement(20mb-200mb drives) I did run smack into one Seagate that simply quit without making a sound some time back on an old Packard Bell. You know that was an older system there with a 1.2gb drive.
 
erm, if it doesn't have the clicks of death or run into problems then its fine.

BTW, Seagate is one of the BEST brands in the world. The majority of the people use Seagate Hard Drives. Some do use WD (which is now owned by seagate).

Whoever told you seagate sucks, tell him he's an idiot:D

haha, ok. Thanks. and I will... the bastard was trying to sell me a new HD, thats probably why he said Seagate sucks, lol.
 
erm, if it doesn't have the clicks of death or run into problems then its fine.

BTW, Seagate is one of the BEST brands in the world. The majority of the people use Seagate Hard Drives. Some do use WD (which is now owned by seagate).

Whoever told you seagate sucks, tell him he's an idiot:D

Seagate drives are ok, but they dont own W/D

2000: Maxtor buys competitor Quantum's hard drive business. At the time, Quantum is the number-two drive maker, behind Seagate; this acquisition makes Maxtor the world's largest hard drive manufacturer.

2003: Western Digital introduces the first 10,000-rpm SATA hard drive, the 37GB Raptor, which is designed for the enterprise, but which gamers quickly learn is a hot desktop performer in dual-drive RAID setups.

2006: Seagate completes the acquisition of Maxtor, further narrowing the field of hard drive manufacturers.

2006: Seagate releases the Barracuda 7200.10, at 750GB the largest hard drive to date.

2006: Western Digital launches its 10,000-rpm Raptor X SATA hard drive, boosting its capacity to 150GB and placing a flashy transparent window that allows specially designed computer cases to showcase its inner workings.
 
I saw that 750gb model when it first came out and was listed available. WD recently followed that with their 500gb sata drive. But I still couldn't see the average user needing a sata array with that large of drive for what photos, a few mp3s, and some video. With video capturing regular here the largest amount of space taken for video files was 187gb which saw the 250gb slow right up. A pair of 500gb sata drives would still offer more room then would ever be needed.
 
Back
Top