tweaker
VIP Member
Ambushed_ said:Nvidia way better Gaffics than ATI and more popular.
Ambushed_ said:Nvidia!!!
You've got genuine experience with both companies products I assume.
Ambushed_ said:Nvidia way better Gaffics than ATI and more popular.
Ambushed_ said:Nvidia!!!
tweaker said:You've got genuine experience with both companies products I assume.
how about 6600?and you can raelly get a nvidia card like that in that price range, the closest to that is the 6600GT.
Also note that the X700 is a scrapped productMy X700 retails for around $150-$180 and it runs games on all really high, good luck finding a PCI-E Nvidia that can do the same in that price range (the closest is the 6600GT- if that is even for PCI-E i don't know.....)
I rest my caseif that is even for PCI-E i don't know.....
MatrixEVO said:I would choose nVidia if you wanted to game and use Photoshop or CADD, but if you want to render, then get a really powerful ATI card. Nvidia has SLi which can double your performance too, so think about that...
MatrixEVO said:I would choose nVidia if you wanted to game and use Photoshop or CADD, but if you want to render, then get a really powerful ATI card. Nvidia has SLi which can double your performance too, so think about that...
GhostEye said:yea and totaly slow down ur system with all the overhead that would create...
~80% depending on the game and res isn't enough for ya?GhostEye said:It is NOWHERE NEAR doubling your performance
GhostEye said:all people think about is POWER POWER POWER, I WANT MORE DAMN POWER!!!!!!!!
when did people forget about efficiency....
Archangel said:thats why i like AMD![]()