Yeah I only sent the fixed one to Jonnyp11 and Denther to try out for me with their AMDs and they both reported back saying that it didn't work.
Yep it didn't work.
|Official| Smiles Benchmark 2.0 Ranking Thread! (new version :P)
- Thread starter Virssagòn
- Start date
Jamebonds1
Active Member
Yeah I only sent the fixed one to Jonnyp11 and Denther to try out for me with their AMDs and they both reported back saying that it didn't work.
Maybe try with different complied program? Or we just can have one top Intel and one top AMD without have all intel and amd in one top?
Just little advice.
Last edited:
Virssagòn
VIP Member
Got penta-threaded working now!!
i5's got 100% (all quaaads and lower core cpu's) and on an i7 63% load!
Now making a second benchmark test, a short one with 8 threads working on same moment. This would be a cpu killer for quads if we made them as long as other one.
grtz
smile
i5's got 100% (all quaaads and lower core cpu's) and on an i7 63% load!
Now making a second benchmark test, a short one with 8 threads working on same moment. This would be a cpu killer for quads if we made them as long as other one.
grtz
smile
This afternoon, Smile and I have been working on a new version which makes the CPU run at 100% on all cores (on 4 threads, around 60% if you have 8 threads) and we think we may have fixed the issues with AMD chips.
Here are some benchmarks I ran on my old Q8300. I've added a "Restart Benchmark" button which will clear all the scores and restart the benchmark if you wish, and I've added warning dialogues about the crashing as well as a dialogue/message box which shows up once the bench has completed. SmileMan has been working on another set of new instructions and sorting out the issues with AMD CPUs.
As the Q8300 is an old chip (and I'm using Vista on a dying 5400 RPM HDD), you should be able to expect your scores to be much LOWER/better than what I achieved.
Temps wise, you need to be careful about running this benchmark now if you have an overclocked CPU but with stock or poor cooling. I was getting around 70C with the stock cooler on my Q8300 at full load. The benchmark runs for around 3-5 minutes now on slower CPUs (around 1-2 on faster ones) so make sure your chip can withstand fairly high temps for short periods of time before running the new bench. I would not recommend running this benchmark if you have an unstable or untested overclock.
The new version will be available to download and run shortly. I see SmileMan has already cleared all of the scores.
I'll let you know how my 2500K does too.
Here are some benchmarks I ran on my old Q8300. I've added a "Restart Benchmark" button which will clear all the scores and restart the benchmark if you wish, and I've added warning dialogues about the crashing as well as a dialogue/message box which shows up once the bench has completed. SmileMan has been working on another set of new instructions and sorting out the issues with AMD CPUs.
As the Q8300 is an old chip (and I'm using Vista on a dying 5400 RPM HDD), you should be able to expect your scores to be much LOWER/better than what I achieved.
Temps wise, you need to be careful about running this benchmark now if you have an overclocked CPU but with stock or poor cooling. I was getting around 70C with the stock cooler on my Q8300 at full load. The benchmark runs for around 3-5 minutes now on slower CPUs (around 1-2 on faster ones) so make sure your chip can withstand fairly high temps for short periods of time before running the new bench. I would not recommend running this benchmark if you have an unstable or untested overclock.
The new version will be available to download and run shortly. I see SmileMan has already cleared all of the scores.
I'll let you know how my 2500K does too.
Last edited:
Virssagòn
VIP Member
dang you, i can run this at 3.9 for a while before it will overheat and it's stable too (burn tested on standard and didn't pass 60, maximum burn prob would'a hit 70) but i cant unlock now
I'm also making short one, which is 8-threaded. It will last 5-10 seconds, so no damage can be dealed by temps.
MyCattMaxx
Active Member
Couldn't have been stable if it over heats under load.dang you, i can run this at 3.9 for a while before it will overheat and it's stable too (burn tested on standard and didn't pass 60, maximum burn prob would'a hit 70) but i cant unlock now
jonnyp11
New Member
get too hot, not overheat to where it shuts itself off or anything, just past where i want it.
Jamebonds1
Active Member
I had overclocked to almost 5 GHz on my i3. It is 71 C at full load with prime95
Virssagòn
VIP Member
sry, but our app is heavyer then prime torture max heat...
You can try running it at 5GHz on an i3 at 71C but it may end up in your system crashing.
Jamebonds1
Active Member
Lol. I let it running like 6 test still stable
Before i turn BCLK up i test it with Prime95, still stable.
If you think it's going to be OK then by all means feel free to run our benchmark and let us know the score once we upload it. I'd be interested to see them!
Jamebonds1
Active Member
If you think it's going to be OK then by all means feel free to run our benchmark and let us know the score once we upload it. I'd be interested to see them!
Plus. I have turn some voltage to 2 volt
Plus. I have turn some voltage to 2 volt
You're just crazy.
3 volts??!! for a CPU??!!
Jamebonds1
Active Member
You're just crazy.
Nah. Just kidding
I would never turn it over 1.65 volt for safe of my cpu.
Virssagòn
VIP Member
Nah. Just kidding
1.65v is already a damaging voltage xD
Jamebonds1
Active Member
Yeah. It is marked as red volt on my BIOS gigabyte.