Thats a good pointwell seeing as I said it was between the AMD Athlon 64 3400+ and the P4 3.2GHz I think its a bit obvious which I meant when I said Athlon. surely you can figure that one out right?
Thats a good pointwell seeing as I said it was between the AMD Athlon 64 3400+ and the P4 3.2GHz I think its a bit obvious which I meant when I said Athlon. surely you can figure that one out right?
Praetor said:How about the fact that you can get a P4C setup for shitloads less money?
Ah that would have made sense (of course, a well researched P4C-2.8 system can be had for only $100CAD -- $75USD more than the AMD system) ... just gotta look around.i was referrring to P4C/AthlonXP setup, not A64...shoulda said that
Have a look at the Socket 754s ... quite affordable all things consideringi don't think i'll ever go A64 unless I win the lottery lol.
Praetor said:Have a look at the Socket 754s ... quite affordable all things considering
You and I both bloody know thats blantent fanboyism and as much as I love AMD you simply cant make a fanboyish statement like that
Ace1627 said:Pentium 4 is def the way to go. Getting a 64, though nice, is completely worthless. Nothing out is in 64bit except for maybe 2 games and a beta version of Windows. Sure I may be slightly bias but when programs start running in 64bit, Intel will make a 64bit chip and I believe that it will be superior. Hope this helps.
OM..GA 64-bit computing experience means that our PCs will no longer be limited to addressing only 4GB of RAM. In a 64-bit environment, it's now possible to address 8 terabytes of memory
The real beauty here lies in the Athlon64's ability to run current 32-bit applications and operating systems right now, and with "no" penalty. When 64-bit applications and OSes come to market, the Athlon64 will be ready to take advantage of them and still be able to run native 32-bit apps right alongside the 64-bit ones.
ZER0X said:OM..G
Naturally but when comparing Socket754 vs Socket478/775 it gives AMD a player in the price ballparkbut isn't the socket939 better?
No. The S939s have 2GHzDont all 64's have 1600mhz bus rates?
I can permanently help you if need be.I'll say it again I just cant help it
When you make blanket statements, do some research:is completely worthless. Nothing out is in 64bit except for maybe 2 games and a beta version of Windows
its not all that expensive considering the rest of the setups are about $1600 per partbut who can afford 8terrabytes of RAM?!?!?! not me lol.
I can permanently help you if need be.
Praetor said:LOL im just messin with ya .... but seriously, unbacked, (seemingly random) amd ultra-broad (fanboyish) comments arent gonna help people that what to get a serious answer and such Heehee