Encore4More said:now does dual core baisically mean there are 2 2.8ghz processors smashed into one? like 2 2.8ghz working at the same time?
and would that b equivilent to 5.6ghz?
Encore4More said:now does dual core baisically mean there are 2 2.8ghz processors smashed into one? like 2 2.8ghz working at the same time?
and would that b equivilent to 5.6ghz?
liuliuboy said:Yes dual core means that there are 2 2.8ghz processors smashed into one..sorta. But it doesn't yeild 5.6ghz. You will only see increase in performance when you're multitasking or running multithreaded applications.
edit: wow...i was beat by ckfordy
Encore4More said:so would it not be good for gaming... because i heard different reports on their comparison that AMD was all gaming and Intel was all multi-tasking and media stuff...
i am looking for something in between...
cus i do gaming but not extreme, but i do multi tasking and media stuff to
and i was looking for something well balanced...
like i dont want:
Gaming:9/10
MultiTasking & Media:4/10
or
Gaming:4/10
MultiTasking & Media:9/10
i want
Gaming:7/10
MultiTasking & Media:7/10
something balanced and i read that the pentium d was like that somewhere
Encore4More said:can't go over $230
if it did dont you think they would advertise that on the boxI heard amd is better for games but i heard it could be problems using a 64 dual core on XP home.
i think he has 230 for th chip and 130 for the board, i think!No dual core chip + mobo will fit such a low budget.
Although i'd be tempted to spend a little less on the mobo, and a little more on the CPU, and perhaps look at the X2 3800+tweaker said:If so he may be able to build a dc box with the 8/920.
nonono that wus just the how much i wus willing to spend on a processor... and i decided to get amd athlon x2... the one in my signature...tweaker said:No dual core chip + mobo will fit such a low budget.
Encore4More said:nonono that wus just the how much i wus willing to spend on a processor...