maroon1
New Member
I've heard some people say this.. that ATI cards actually render better or something to that effect.. Making a clearer more defined picture. I've only used Nvidia simply because each time they had the better mid-range card. I can't wait to put an ATI card into my (upgraded) comp![]()
No, HD2900XT doesn't produce a better image than 8800
http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q2/radeon-hd-2900xt/index.x?pg=8
The image quality is approximately the same.
The bad thing about HD2900XT is that it consume more power than 8800GTS, and it produce more noise, even more than 8800Ultra
Yeah and i think its an effective competitor only to get better as more matured drivers are released. if i had the money i'd buy one![]()
The drivers of 8800 series is also not matured, still it have many issues. So both ATI and Nvidia need to make more matured video card
However, the price HD2900XT is not so good, because you can get 8800GTS 640MB which $70 cheaper and according to benchmarks we have it performs about the same.
If the price of HD2900XT drops down a little, then it would be a great deal.
However, the 6 months old HD2900XT is a big a disappointment because every one thought that it will be about two times faster than 8800GTX, but now HD2900XT came out and what is the result ? It loses for 8800GTS in some benchmarks. And it consumes hell of power, and produce a high level of noises
Last edited: